Skip to main content
Log in

Is early dynamic lymphoscintigraphy for detection of sentinel lymph nodes always achievable in breast tumor?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

In this article, we will discuss the achievement of early dynamic lymphoscintigraphic protocol and compare detection of sentinel node between benign and malignant breast tumors, and whether pathologic factor is related or not.

Methods

During a six-month period, consecutive fifty-nine patients were enrolled into our study. The average age of patients was 47.6 ± 9.8 years and all of them were clinically suspected of having breast cancer. The average tumor was 2.1 ± 1.1 cm in size. First, Tc-99m sulfur colloid was injected around corners of palpable mass or biopsy cavity by the hybrid injection method. Immediately thereafter, dynamic protocol of lymphoscintigraphy, with 10 sec per frame for 60 frames was performed by established simultaneous dual-head vertical angle imaging technique. And delayed two-hour image was also acquired. All patients underwent surgery sixteen to twenty hours later and had a final pathological diagnosis.

Results

Among 59 patients, 14 of them were diagnosed with fibroadenoma and the other 45 cases with malignant conditions, infiltrating duct carcinoma mostly. The average age of the two groups was similar. From the summation image of dynamic study, identified axillary sentinel nodal activity was found as 80% in the group of benign breast tumor, but only 48% in the group of malignant breast tumor. In more than 88% of patients, sentinel lymph node was detectable on the delayed two-hour image between the two groups.

Conclusions

Early dynamic protocol of pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy is helpful to clarify the relationship between the local lymphatic drainage basin and sentinel nodal uptake. However, this short period of protocol is not always achievable to detect sentinel node, especially in the group with breast malignant lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.Ann Surg 1994; 220: 391–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Giuliano AE. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in primary breast carcinoma: an alternative to routine axillary dissection.J Surg Oncol 1996; 62: 75–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe.Surg Oncol 1993; 2:335–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes.Lancet 1997; 349: 1864–1867.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study.N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 941–946.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, Yeatman T, Balducci L, Ku N, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patients with breast cancer.JAMA 1996; 276: 1818–1822.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox CE, Bass SS, McCann CR, Ku NN, Berman C, Durand K, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer.Ann Rev Med 2000;51:525–542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cody HS III, Fey J, Akhurst T, Fazzari M, Mazumdar M, Yeung H, et al. Complementarity of blue dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis of 966 procedures.Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8: 13–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alazraki NP, Styblo T, Grant SF, Cohen C, Larsen T, Waldrop S, et al. Sentinel node staging of early breast cancer using lymphoscintigraphy and the intraoperative gamma-detecting probe.Semin Nucl Med 2000; 30: 56–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Noguchi M. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and breast cancer.Br J Surg 2002; 89: 21–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mariani G, Moresco L, Viale G, Villa G, Bagnasco M, Canavese G, et al. Radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery.J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 1198–1215.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Uren RF, Howman-Giles RB, Thompson JF. Variation in cutaneous lymphatic flow rates.Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4:279–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeung HW, Cody HI HS, Turlakow A, Riedel ER, Fey J, Gonen M, et al. Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer patients: a comparison between 1 -day and 2-day protocols.J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 420–423.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Szuba A, Shin WS, Strauss HW, Rockson S. The third circulation: radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphedema.J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 43–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Borys RK, Chun KK, Michail KS, Karina M, Josef M. Breast cancer and its management: the utility and technique of lymphoscintigraphy.Nucl Med Annual 2003; 131–169.

  16. Liesl C, Bruce MG. Alterative sites of injection for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.ANZ J Surg 2003; 73:600–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin RC, Derossis AM, Fey J. Intradermal isotope injection is superior to intramammary in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.Surgery 2001; 130: 432–438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nathason SD, Wachna DL, Karvelis K, Havstad S, Ferrara J. Pathways of lymphatic drainage from the breast.Ann Surg 2001; 8: 837–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, Diest PV, Boom RP, Meijer S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection.J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 275–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Birdwell RL, Smith KL, Betts BJ, Ikeda DM, Strauss HW, Jeffer SS. Breast cancer: Variables affecting sentinel lymph node visualization at preoperative lymphoscintigraphy.Radiology 2001; 220: 47–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haigh PI, Hansen NM, Qi K, Giuliano AE. Biopsy method and excision volume do not affect success rate of subsequent sentinel lymph node dissection in breast cancer.Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:21–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ. Lymphatic invasion, tumor size, and age are independent predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in women with T1 breast cancers.Ann Surg 1999; 230: 692–696.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brenot-Rossi I, Houvenaeghel G, Jacquemier J, Bardou VJ, Martino M, Hassan-Sebbag N, et al. Nonvisualization of axillary sentinel node during lymphoscintigraphy: is there a pathologic significance in breast cancer?J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 1232–1237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanis PJ, van Sandick JW, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, Rutgers EJ, Hoefnagel CA, et al. The hidden sentinel node in breast cancer.Eur J Nucl Med 2002; 29: 305–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nathanson SD. Insights into the mechanisms of lymph node metastasis.Cancer 2003; 98: 413–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Feng Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, YW., Chuang, YW., Lai, YC. et al. Is early dynamic lymphoscintigraphy for detection of sentinel lymph nodes always achievable in breast tumor?. Ann Nucl Med 20, 45–50 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985590

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985590

Key words

Navigation