Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between bone scintigraphy and tumor markers in patients with breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to specify the precise role of bone scintigraphy and serum CEA and CA 15-3 assays in the monitoring of breast cancers in order to optimize their use and to determine whether it is possible to guide the prescription of bone scan by the use of CEA and CA 15-3 assays in the monitoring of breast cancer.

Methods

For this purpose, from November 1997 to May 2002, 98 consecutive female breast cancer patients (median age, 52 years; range 35-77 years) underwent bone scintigraphy during follow-up. In these patients values of tumor markers were compared with the results of bone scintigraphy. Some of the patients with bone metastasis were checked repeatedly at intervals of 6 to 12 months, resulting in 49 patients with bone metastasis and 74 patients without bone metastasis being included in the study.

Results

In patients with bone metastasis, serum CEA levels were abnormal in 23/49 cases and CA 15-3 serum concentrations were elevated above the cut-off in 33/49 cases. Among patients without bone metastasis, CEA and CA 15-3 serum concentrations were normal in 50/74 and 55/74 cases respectively. The combination of the two markers improved the diagnostic sensitivity.

Conclusion

Although serial tumor marker measurements are an efficient and cost effective method of monitoring disease progression, it does not allow prediction of the bone scan results; so it is not justifiable to reject a bone scintigraphy on the basis of these markers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coleman RE, Rubens RD. The clinical course of bone metastasis from breast cancer.Br J Cancer 1987; 55:61–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman RE, Rubens RD, Fogelman I. Reappraisal of the baseline bone scan in breast cancer.J Nucl Med 1988; 29:1045–1049.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Crippa F, Bombardieri E, Seregni M, et al. Single determination of CA 15.3 and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of skeletal metastasis of breast cancer.J Nucl Biol Med 1992; 36:52–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicolini A, Ferrari P, Sagripanti A, Carpi A. The role of tumour markers in predicting skeletal metastasis in breast cancer patients with equivocal bone scintigraphy.Br J Cancer 1999; 79:1443–1447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zanco ?, Rota G, Sportiello V, et al. Diagnosis of bone and liver metastasis in breast cancer comparing tumor markers and imaging techniques.Int J Biol Markers 1989; 4:103–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Brien DP, Horgan PG, Gough DB, et al. CA 15-3: a reliable indicator of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer patients.Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1992; 74:9–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kokko R, Holli K, Hakama M. Ca 15-3 in the follow-up of localised breast cancer: a prospective study.Eur J Cancer 2002;38:1189–1193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forest JC, Masse J, Lane A. Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Boehringer Mannheim Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer.Clin Biochem 1998; 31 (2):81–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koizumi M, Yamada Y, Takiguchi T, et al. Bone metabolic markers in bone metastasis.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1995; 121:542–548.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tubiana-Hulin M. Incidence, prevalence and distribution of bone metastasis.Bone 1991; 12:9–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook GJR, Fogelman I. Skeletal metastasis from breast cancer: Imaging with Nuclear Medicine.Semin Nucl Med 1999; 29:69–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer. Adopted on May 17, 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:2843–2877.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Safi F, Kohler I, Rottinger E, Beger H. The value of the tumor marker CA 15-3 in diagnosing and monitoring breast cancer. A comperative study with carcinoembryonic antigen.Cancer 1991; 68:574–582.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Buffaz PD, Gauchez AS, Caravel JP, et al. Can tumor marker assays be a guide in the prescription of bone scan for breast and lung cancers?Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26:8–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Younsi N, Montravers F, Philippe C, et al. CA 15-3 and bone scintigraphy in the follow-up of breast cancer.Int J Biol Markers 1997; 12:154–157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Yildiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yildiz, M., Oral, B., Bozkurt, M. et al. Relationship between bone scintigraphy and tumor markers in patients with breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med 18, 501–505 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984567

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984567

Key words

Navigation