Skip to main content
Log in

Design and implementation of 30„ geometry PIG

  • Published:
KSME International Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces the developed geometry PIG (Pipeline Inspection Gauge), one of several ILI (In-Line Inspection) tools, which provide a full picture of the pipeline from only single pass, and has compact size of the electronic device with not only low power consumption but also rapid response of sensors such as calipers, IMU and odometer. This tool is equipped with the several sensor systems. Caliper sensors measure the pipeline internal diameter, ovality and dent size and shape with high accuracy. The IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit) measures the precise trajectory of the PIG during its traverse of the pipeline. The IMU also provide three-dimensional coordination in space from measurement of inertial acceleration and angular rate. Three odometers mounted on the PIG body provide the distance moved along the line and instantaneous velocity during the PIG run. The datum measured by the sensor systems are stored in on-board solid state memory and magnetic tape devices. There is an electromagnetic transmitter at the back end of the tool, the transmitter enables the inspection operators to keep tracking the tool while it travels through the pipeline. An experiment was fulfilled in pull-rig facility and was adopted from Incheon LT (LNG Terminal) to Namdong GS (Governor Station) line, 13 km length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cordell, J. and Vanzant, H., 1999, All About Pigging, On-Stream Systems Ltd and Hershel Vanzant & Associates.

  • Cox, M., Garrigus A., Walker, W. and Wade, R. L., 1995, “Pipeline Monitoring and Remedial action from Inertial Geometry Surveys in Buried Pipelines,”Pipeline and Inspection Technology Conference, Houston, Texas.

  • Czyz, J. A., Fraccaroli, C. and Sergeant, A. P., 1996, “Measuring Pipeline Movement in Geotechnically Unstable Areas Using An Inertial Geometry Pipeline Inspection Pig,”ASME 1-st International Pipeline Conference, Calgary.

  • Nguyen, T. T., Yoo, H. R., Rho, Y. W. and Kim, S. B., 2001, “Modeling and Simulation for PIG Flow Control in Natural Gas Pipeline,”KSME International Journal, Vol. 15. No. 8, pp. 1165–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiratsoo, J. N. H., 1992, Pipeline Pigging Techaology 2nd Edition Nayler The Printer Ltd, Accrington, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R. P., Ernst, H. K. and Ron, L. W., 1990, “Pipeline Geometry Pigging: Application of Strapdown INS,”IEEE Journal, CH2811-88, pp. 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Kyu Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, D.K., Cho, S.H., Park, S.S. et al. Design and implementation of 30„ geometry PIG. KSME International Journal 17, 629–636 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983858

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983858

Key Words

Navigation