Skip to main content
Log in

The behaviour of pollen starch in a Geranium and its bud sport

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The pollen of the Pelargonium, Salmon Fringed, and its Zonal bud sport can be classified into starch-filled, partly starchy, and starch-free.

In both cases the percentage of starch-filled reaches a maximum of about 93 per cent. in buds of 8 to 12 mm. length, then drops rapidly to about 15 per cent. in buds 15 mm. long. From this point on to anthesis the change is slower, reaching an equilibrium at about 20 mm.

The pollen of open flowers of Salmon Fringed has almost exactly twice (6.4-6.6 per cent.) the percentage of starch-filled pollen shown by its bud sport (3.3-3.8 per cent.). This is an expression of a difference in rate of starch digestion.

Temperatures of 25 and 30° C. hasten starch digestion, while 15° retards it. Behaviour at both extremes is erratic.

Analysis of pollen carbohydrate conditions for genetical purposes can perhaps be facilitated by the foregoing physiological considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  1. Parnell, F. R. (1921). “Note on the detection of segregation by examination of the pollen of rice,”Journ. Genetics, Vol. xi. pp. 209–212, Pl. XXI.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Demerec, M. (1924), “A case of pollen dimorphism in maize.”Amer. Journ. Bot. Vol. xi. pp. 461–464, Fig. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiesselbach, T. A. andPeterson, N. F. (1925). “The occurrence of starch and erythrodexferin in maize and their segregation in the pollen of hybrids.”Genetics, Vol.x. pp. 86–89, PL I.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bateson, W. (1921). “Root-cuttings and chimaeras. II.”Journ. Genetics, Vol. xi. pp. 91–96, Pls. XIII-XIV.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Renner, O. (1919). “Zur Biologie und Morphologie der männlichen Haplonten einiger Oenotheren.”Zeitschr. Bot. Bd. xr. S. 305–380.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Molisch, H. (1893). “Zur Physiologie des Pollens, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die chemotropischen Bewegungen der Pollenschläuche.”Sitz. hais. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Nat. Cl. Bd. Cii, S. 1–26, T. I.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lidforss, B. (1899). “Weitere Beiträge zur Biologie des Pollens,”Jahrb. wiss. Bot. Bd. xxxiii. S. 233–312.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tischleb, G. (1909). “Untersuchungen Ueber den Stärkegehalt des Pollens tropischer Gewächse.”Jahrb. wiss. Bot. Bd. xlvii. S. 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferguson, N. (1924). “On the determination of the percentage of abortive pollen in plants.”Brit. Journ. Exp. Morph. Vol. ii. pp. 65–73, Tables i–vii.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huxley, J. S. andFord, E. B. (1925). “Mendelian genes and rates of de-velopment.”Nature, Vol. cxvi. pp. 861–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sears, P.B., Metcalf, E. The behaviour of pollen starch in a Geranium and its bud sport. Journ. of Gen. 17, 33–42 (1926). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983304

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983304

Keywords

Navigation