References
Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity, ed. 2 [1923], p. 36.
Hereditas, iv. p. 138, 1923.
References
Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity, ed. 1915, p. 168; ed, 1923, p. 215.
Physical Basis of Heredity, n.d., p. 251.
Reference
SeeJournal of Genetics, xiii. p. 226, and Pl. XVII, Hg. 35, 1923.
References
Journal of Genetics, ii. pp. 237–8 and Pl. XIV, fig. 2, 1912.
Carnegic Inst. Publ. No. 288, Pl. I, 1919.
Reference
Amer. Journ. of Hered. viii. pp. 224, 373, 473, etc. The graphic method of representation which he has suggested has great advantages, and comes nearer to giving a rational and acceptable picture of the phenomena than any I have seen elsewhere. (See especiallyl.c. p. 230.)
Reference
Pres. Address to Brit. Ass., Melbourne, pp. 17–18, 1914.
References
Carn. Inst. Pub. 1919, No. 295.
“The Origin of Variations in Sexual and Sex-linked Characters,”Amer. Nat. lvi. p. 51, 1922; andSci. N.S., liv. Sept. 16, 1921. A fuller development of this conception of “balance” will be found in the new paper by Bridges,Amer. Nat. lix, p. 127, 1925.
References
Strangeways, T. S. P.,Tissue Culture in Relation to Growth and Differentiation, Cambridge, 1924.
Mavor, J. W.,Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med. xx. p. 335, 1923.
Hereditas, iv. p. 235, 1923.
Reference
Journal of Genetics, x. p. 124, 1920.
References
W. H. Gates has lately published a preliminary account of crosses between Japanese waltzing mice and house mice in which the characters similarly segregate often in blocks. Evidence is added indicating that the Japanese areMus wagneri, regarded as a distinct species.Proc. Nat. Ac. Sci., vol. xi. p. 165, 1925.
In plant-sports somatic segregation by blocks is occasionally seen. Sageret (Ann. de la Soc. d’Hort. de Paris, ii. Livre 7, p. 159,1828) describes in detail such an example in a melon which bore two fruits differing from each other in several respects of structure, colour and flavour.
Amer. Nat. li. p. 31, 1917.
References
We have never succeeded in tracing this variety. It is ausitatissimum and perhaps is somewhere cultivated for oil (seeJour, Gen. xi, p. 269, 1921).
A mixture of singles and doubles results, of which the singles breed true. Miss Saunders, on the analogy of Stocks, took the doubles to be recessive, but, as Frl. von Ubisch pointed out, the double may more simply be taken to be a heterozygousdominant, like the ordinary doubleCarnation, on which interpretation no problem arises (Zeits. f. Botanik, xv.).
Reference
W. Bateson and Ida Sutton,Journal of Genetics, viii. p. 199, 1919.
Reference
SeeJournal of Genetics, xiii. 1923, The work onScolopendrium is still unfinished.
References
Journal of Genetics, vi. 1916, and xi. 1921.
Reference
Verh. Phys. Med. Ges., Würzburg, 1924;N.F. xlix. p. 45, andibid. l. p. 47, 1925, andJahrb. wiss. Bot. lxi. 1922.
References
For figures of these plants seeJour. Gen. xi. 1921, PL XIV, figs. 2 and 3; xvi. 1925, Pl. IV.
Genetics, viii. p. 97, 1923.
Reference
In the total sterility of Kleiner Liebling, and especially in the female sterility of Salmon-fringed and the male sterility of Double New Life, the two latter attributable to the presence of a special epidermis, we are reminded of Winkler’s “Solanum Koelreuterianum,” which having an epidermis ofS. nigrum over a core ofS. lycopersicum was likewise totally sterile. Winkler, H.Zeits. f. Botanik, Jg. 2, Heft 1, p. 16, 1909.
References
For an example largely comparable though presenting certain differences, see I. Andersson, “Inheritance of Variegation inBarbarea vulgaris,” Journal of Genetics, xiv. p. 185, 1024.
S.B. preuss. Akad. Wiss. vi. 1920.
References
Chittenden, R. J.,Journal of Genetics, xvi. p. 43, 1925.
Collins, E. J.Journal of Genetics, xii. p. 1, 1922.
Reference
One of the best accounts of the genetics of a mosaic plant is that lately published by Eyster (“A Genetic Analysis of Variegation,”Genetics, ix. p. 372, 1924) on the striping of the pericarp in maize.
References
The great collection of records relating to bud-sports of all kinds is that of Cramer, P. J. S., “Kritische Übersicht der bekannten Fälle von Knospenvariation,”Natuurk. Verh. Holl. Maatsch. d. Wetensch., 3e Verzameling, Deel vi. 3e Stuk, Haarlem, 1907. Those who have no horticultural experience, who refer to Cramer’s work, will appreciate what a conspicuous and frequent part somatic segregation plays among garden plants, attributable without doubt to their heterozygous nature. Incidentally Cramer gives many examples of distinctions in alleged root-cuttings, but in many of these, especially those so commonly witnessed in the propagation of Chrysanthemums, we must not in the absence of anatomical examination assume that the sources of the new shoots were structurally roots. That the great majority of illustrations relate to colour-variation is presumably attributable to the facility with which colour changes attract attention. Structural changes of the same class are no great rarities. For striking recent examples see I. Anclersson’s work onBarbarea (Journal of Genetics, xiv. 1924).
SeeProblems of Genetics, p. 150, 1913.
Reference
Bagg, H. J.,Proc Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. xxi. pp. 146 and 228, 1923–4.
Reference
Chittenden, R. J.,Journal of Genetics, xvi. p. 48, 1925.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bateson, W. Segregation: Being the Joseph Leidy memorial lecture of the University of Pennsylvania, 1922. Journ. of Gen. 16, 201–235 (1926). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982999
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982999