Skip to main content
Log in

A study of chromosome catenation inOenothera hybrids

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bartlett, H. H. (1915). “The status of the mutation theory, with special reference toOenothera.”Amer. Nat.50, 513–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belling, J. (1927). “The attachment of chromosomes at the reduction division in flowering plants.”J. Genet.18, 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside, D. G. (1930). “Chromosome linkage and syndesis inOenothera.”Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.56, 467–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside, D. G. (1931). “Critical evidence of parasynapsis inOenothera.”Proc. Roy. Soc. B,109, 165–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1932). “The chromosomes of a new haploidOenothera.”Cytologia, Tokyo,4, 68–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1933a). “Chromosome catenation in someF 1 Oenothera hybrids.”J. Genet. 27, 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1933b). “Chromosome configurations in trisomicOenotheras.”Genetica,15, 177–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1935). “X-ray treatment ofOenothera chromosomes.”Genetica,17, 313–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1936). “The origin, nature and breeding behaviour of trisomics inOenothera Lamarckiana.”J. Genet. 33, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, R. E. (1922). “The reduction divisions in pollen mother cells ofOenothera franciscana.”Amer. J. Bot.9, 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, R. E. &Blakeslee, A. F. (1930). “Interaction between complexes as evidence for segmental interchange inOenothera.”Proc. nat. Acad. Sci.16, 183–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —— —— (1931). “Segmental interchange the basis of chromosome attachments inOenothera.”Cytologia, Tokyo,2, 175–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, R. E. &Oehlkers, F. (1929). “New evidence bearing upon the problem of the cytological basis for genetical peculiarities in theOenotheras.”Amer. Nat.63, 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, F. B. (1921). “A case of Mendelian inheritance complicated by heterogametism and mutation inOenothera pratincola.”Genetics,6, 1–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, F. B. &Bartlett, H. H. (1919). “On Mendelian inheritance in crosses between mass-mutating and non-mass-mutating strains ofOenothera pratincola.”J. Wash. Acad. Sci.9, 462–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. (1931). “The cytological theory of inheritance inOenothera.”J. Genet.24, 405–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, S. H. (1936). “A genetic and cytological analysis ofOenothera pratincola and one of its revolute-leaved mutations.”J. Genet.32, 315–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, S. H. &Sturtevant, A. H. (1931). “Genetic and cytological studies inOenothera. III. The translocation interpretation.”Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre,59, 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. (1907). “Preliminary note on pollen development inOenothera lata and its hybrids.”Science,25, 259–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1908). “A study of reduction inOenothera rubrinervis.”Bot. Gaz. 46, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1909). “The behaviour of the chromosomes inOenothera lata × Oenothera gigas.”Bot. Gaz. 48, 179–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1912). “Somatic mitosis inOenothera.”Ann. Bot., Lond.,26, 993–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1915). “On the origin and behaviour ofOenothera rubricalyx.”J. Genet. 4, 353–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -- (1927). “The relation of cytology to genetics inOenothera.”Verh. Int. Kongr. Vererb., Berlin, 1927.

  • —— (1928). “The cytology ofOenothera.”Bibliogr. genet. 4, 401–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1929). “A haploidOenothera.”Nature, Lond.,124, 948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1931). “The cytological basis of mutations.”Amer. Nat. 65, 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1933a). “Some phylogenetic considerations on the genusOenothera, with description of two new species.”J. Linn. Soc. 49, 173–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. (1933b). “The general bearings of recent research inOenothera.”Amer. Nat.67, 352–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1938). “The species concept in the light of cytology and genetics.”Amer. Nat. 72, 340–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. &Catcheside, D. G. (1932). “Gamolysis of various newOenotheras.”J. Genet.26, 143–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. &Ford, C. E. (1938). “Chromosome catenations inOenothera.”Tabulae Biolog.15, 122–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. &Sheffield, F. M. L. (1929a). “Chromosome linkage in certainOenothera hybrids.”Philos. Trans. B,217, 367–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— —— (1929b). “Megaspore development inOenothera rubricalyx, with a note on chromosome linkage inOenothera angustissima.”Proc. Roy. Soc. B,105, 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeppener, E. &Renner, O. (1929). “Genetische und zytologische Oenotherenstudien. II. Zur Kenntniss vonOe. rubrinervis, deserens, Lamarckiana-gigas, biennis-gigas, franciscana, Hookeri, suaveolens, lutescens.”Bot. Abh.15, 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, C. G. (1929). “Meiosis in pollen mother cells of strains ofOenothera pratincola Bartlett.”Bot. Gaz.87, 218–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Cour, L. (1931). “Improvements in everyday technique in plant cytology.”J Roy. micr. Soc.51, 119–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latter, J. (1926). “The pollen development ofLathyrus odoratus.”Ann. Bot., Lond.,40, 277–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehlkers, F. (1926). “Erblichkeit und Zytologie einiger Kreuzungen mitOenothera strigosa.”Jb. wiss. Bot.65, 401–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, O. (1925). “Untersuchungen über die faktorielle Konstitution einiger Komplex-heterozygotischer önotheren.”Bibliotheca Genet.9, 168 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, O. &Cleland, R. E. (1933). “Zur Genetik und Cytologie derOenothera chicaginensis und ihrer Abkommlinge.”Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre,66, 275–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semmens, C. S. &Bhaduri, P. N. (1939). “A technic for differential staining of nucleoli and chromosomes.”Stain. Tech.14, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, F. M. L. (1927). “Cytological studies of certain meiotic stages inOenothera.”Ann. Bot., Lond.,41, 779–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, G. H. (1925). “The third linkage group inOenothera.”Proc. nat. Acad. Sci.11, 715–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1926). “‘Old Gold’ flower colour, the second case of independent inheritance inOenothera.”Genetics,11, 201–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1928). “A new gene-mutation (mut.bullata) inOenothera Lamarckiana and its linkage relations.”Verh. Int. Kongr. Vereb. Berlin, 1927,2, 1322–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, S. M. (1939). “Cytogenetics ofBrassica hybrids and species.” (In the Press.)

  • Stomps, T. J. (1930). “Über parthenogenetische Oenotheren.”Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges.48, 119–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, M. (1934). “Meiosis and catenation in certain crosses ofOenothera rubricalyx.”Ann. Bot., Lond.,48, 153–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part III of thesis accepted for the Ph.D. degree of the University of London.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sikka, S.M. A study of chromosome catenation inOenothera hybrids. Journ. of Genetics 39, 309–334 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982845

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982845

Keywords

Navigation