Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Non-disjunction inOenothera and the genesis of trisomics

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belling, J. (1930).The Use of the Microscope. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F. (1930). “Extra chromosomes as a source of variations in the Jimson weed.”Smithsonian Report for 1930, pp. 431–50.

  • Capinpin, J. M. (1933). “Studies on the genetics and cytology of triploid Oenotheras.”Cytologia,4, 355–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside, D. G. (1933). “Chromosome configurations in trisomic Oenotheras.”Genetica,15, 178–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1935). “X-ray treatment ofOenothera chromosomes.” Ibid.17, 314–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1936). “Origin, anture and breeding behaviour ofOenothera Lamarckiana trisomics.”J. Genet. 33, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. (1931). “The cytological theory of inheritance inOenothera.” Ibid.24, 405–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. M. (1910). “Cytological studies onOenothera. II. The reduction, divisions ofO. biennis.”Ann. Bot.24, 631–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1911). “Cytological studies onOenothera. III. A comparison of the reduction, divisions ofO. Lamarckiana andO. gigas.” Ibid.25, 941–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulfer, H. (1926). “Die Erblichkeitserscheinungen derOenothera Lamarckiana semigigas.” Diss. Amsterdam; J. H. de Bussy, pp. 71, figs. 8.

  • Gates, R. R. (1908). “A study of reduction inOenothera rubrinervis.”Bot. Gaz.44, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1923). “The trisomic mutations ofOenothera.”Ann. Bot. 37, 543, 563.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1936). “Genetical and Taxonomic investigations in the genusOenothera.”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Series B,226.

  • Gates, R. R. &Catcheside, D. G. (1932). “Gamolysis of various new Oenotheras.”J. Genet.26, 143–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. &Nandi, H. K. (1935). “The cytology of trisomic mutations in a wild species ofOenothera.”Philos. Trans. B,225, 227–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, A. (1930). “Zur Zytologie Trisomischer Mutanten ausOenothera Lamarckiana.”Hereditas,14, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeppener, E. &Renner, O. (1929). “Genetische und Zytologische Oenotherastudien.” IIBot. Abhandl.15, 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, O. (1917). “Versuche über die Gametische Konstitution der Oenotheren.”Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre,18, 121–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansome, E. R. (1932). “Segmental interchange inPisum.”Cytologia,3, 200–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, E. (1935). “Half-disjunction in an association of four chromosomes inPisum Sativum.”Ann. Bot.49, 689–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vries, H. de (1916). “New dimorphic mutants of the Oenotheras.”Bot. Gaz.62, 249–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vries, H. de &Boedijn, K. (1923). “On the distribution of mutant characters among the chromosomes ofO. Lamarckiana.”Genetics,8, 233–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Botany Department, University of London, King’s College, UK

    C. E. Ford B.Sc.

Authors
  1. C. E. Ford B.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ford, C.E. Non-disjunction inOenothera and the genesis of trisomics. Journ. of Genetics 33, 275–303 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982537

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982537

Keywords

Search

Navigation