Skip to main content
Log in

Meiosis inCrepis

I. Pachytene association and chiasma behaviour inCrepis capillaris (L.) Wallr. andC. tectorum L

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1. Meiosis is normal and has been followed through all stages from pachytene to second metaphase inCrepis capillaris (L.) Wallr. andC. tectorum L. A quantitative analysis of chiasma behaviour has been made for each kind of bivalent. Chiasma frequency is low, the majority of bivalents inC. capillaris having only one chiasma.

2. The satellitedD chromosomes in both species are observed to be attached to the nucleolus at both the first and the second meiotic divisions.

3. The two chromosomes of a bivalent are coiled about one another in the early stages. Uncoiling is gradual and complete by diakinesis.

4. Bivalents of theC chromosomes have single terminalised chiasmata at mid-diakinesis, whereas single chiasmata in the longerA andD bivalents rarely terminalise.

5. Similar chromosomes ofC. capillaris andC. tectorum show closely similar mean chiasma frequencies during diakinesis, and the same types of bivalent configuration.

6. Chiasma frequency at mid-diakinesis is almost directly proportional to length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avery, Priscilla (1930). “Cytological studies of five interspecific hybrids ofCrepis leontodontoides.”Univ. Calif. Publ. agric. Sci. 6, 135–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, E. B. andClausen, J. (1929). “Meiosis in two species and three hybrids ofCrepis and its bearing on taxonomic relationship.” Ibid.2, 401–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belling, J. (1927). “The attachments of chromosomes at the reduction division in flowering plants.”J. Genet. 18, 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1931). “Chiasmas in flowering plants.”Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 16, 311–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Julius L. (1920). “Inbreeding and crossbreeding inCrepis capillaris (L.) Wallr.”Univ. Calif. Publ. agric. Sci. 2, 205–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. L., Hollingshead, Lillian andAvery, Priscilla (1929). “Inter-specific hybrids inCrepis. III. Constant fertile forms containing chromosomes derived from two species.”Genetics,14, 305–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. L. andMann, Margaret C. (1923). “Interspecific hybrids inCrepis. II. A preliminary report on the results of hybridisingCrepis setosa Hall. withCrepis capillaris (L.) Wallr. and withC. biennis L.” Ibid.8, 212–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. (1930). “Chromosome studies inFritillaria. III. Chiasma formation and chromosome pairing inFritillaria imperialis.”Cytologia,2, 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. andDark, S. O. S. (1932). “Origin and behaviour of Chiasmata. II.Stenobothrus parallelus.” Ibid.3, 169–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. andJanaki-Ammal, E. K. (1932). “The origin and behaviour of chiasmata. I. Diploid and tetraploidTulipa.”Bot. Gaz. 93, 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digby, L. (1914). “Critical study of the cytology ofCrepis virens.”Arch. Zellforsch. 12, 97–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz, E. (1931). “Die Ursache der gesetzmässigen Zahl, Lage, Form und Grösse pflanzlicher Nukleolen.”Planta,12, Heft 4.

  • Hollingshead, Lillian (1930). “Cytological investigations of hybrids and hybrid derivatives ofCrepis capillaris andCrepis tectorum.”Univ. Calif. Publ. agric. Sci. 6, 55–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, T. (1930a). “The meiotic divisions in pollen mother cells of the sweet pea (Lathyrus odoratus) with special reference to the cytological basis of crossing over.”Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto,5, 125–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1930b). “On the configurations of gemini in the pollen mother cells ofVicia Faba L.” Ibid.5, 125–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Margaret Campbell (1925). “Chromosome number and individuality in the genusCrepis. I. A comparative study of the chromosome number and dimensions of nineteen species.”Univ. Calif. Publ. agric. Sci. 2, 294–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchal, E. (1920). “Recherches sur les variations numériques des chromosomes dans la série végétale.”Mém. Acad. R. Belg. sér. 2,4, 1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, Barbara (1931). “Cytological observations of deficiencies involving known genes, translocations and an inversion inZea mays.”Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. No. 163, pp. 2–30.

  • Moffett, A. A. (1932). “Chromosome studies inAnemone. I. A new type of chiasma behaviour.”Cytologia,4, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navashin, M. (1925). “Morphologische Kernstudien derCrepis-Arten in Bezug auf die Artbildung.”Z. Zellforsch. 6, 195–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1927). “Über die Veränderung von Zahl und Form der Chromosomen infolge der Hybridisation.” Ibid.4, 171–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1929). “Studies on polyploidy. I. Cytological investigations on triploidy inCrepis.”Univ. Calif. Publ. agric. Sci. 2, 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, W. C. F. (1927). “Chromosome studies inTulipa and some related genera.”J. linn. Soc. (Bot.),47, 339–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, W. C. F. andDarlington, C. D. (1930). “Fritillaria Meleagris: chiasma formation and distribution.”J. Genet. 22, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Charles F. (1931). “The interspecific hybrid,Crepis rubra × C. foetida, and some of its derivatives. I.”Univ. Calif. Publ. agric. Sci. 6, 169–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1932). “The interspecific hybrid,Crepis rubra × C. foetida, and some of its derivatives. II. Two selfed generations from an amphidiploid hybrid.” Ibid.6, 231–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. Margaret (1934). “The origin and behaviour of Chiasmata. X.Spironema fragrans.”Cytologia,5, 337–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, O. (1909). “Zur Kenntniss von den Tetradenteilungen der Compositen.”Svensk bot. Tidskr. 3, 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1918). “Chromosomenzahlen und Chromosomendimensionen von der GattungCrepis.”Arch. Bot. 15, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, M.M. Meiosis inCrepis . Journ. of Genetics 31, 101–117 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982282

Keywords

Navigation