Skip to main content
Log in

A study of mutations in evolution

II. Ontogeny in the equine skull

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1. Very extensive changes of form appear during foetal and post-natal development in the horse as quantitative functions of increase in total size.

2. These developmental changes of skull shape correspond precisely, if comparison be made between specimens of the same absolute magnitude, to those shape transformations arising during the evolution of the horse.

3. Since progressive pre-optic preponderance in the individual and in the race is algebraically the same function of total size, one may analyse the form of any horse’s skull, either ancient or modern, as the manifestation of the characteristic equine skull pattern modified only by the absolute extent of growth. The post-optic extension ofHyracotherium and the pre-optic preponderance ofEquus are believed to represent a single embryological pattern, of which diverse manifestations occur as a function of total size.

4. The appearance of an “orthogenetic” trend in the evolution of the equine skull is due to the attainment of successively greater adult sizes by the more recent genera.

5. One may interpret the progressive augmentation of racial size as a fortuitous occurrence, possibly aided by some natural selection, perhaps chemically determined by the mutation tendencies of certain size genes, but not inconsistent with the nature of probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becher, A. (1923).Arch. Naturgesch. (9). Quoted by Huxley.

  • Chubb, S. H. (1927). See Matthew and Chubb.

  • Huxley, J. S. (1932).Problems of Relative Growth. With 105 illustrations. Pp. 276. New York: Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, W. D. andChubb, S. H. (1927).Evolution of the Horse. Amer. Museum Nat. Hist. Guide Leaflet series, No. 36. Fifth ed. revised. Pp. 62. New York City.

  • Osborn, H. F. (1929). “Titanotheres of Ancient Wyoming, Dakota and Nebraska.”U.S. Dept. Int. Geol. Survey, Monograph No. 55, 2 vols.

  • Robb, R. C. (1929). “On the nature of hereditary size-limitation. II. The growth of parts in relation to the whole.”Brit. J. exp. Biol. 6, 311–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1932). “Two modes of evolution in the horse.”Proc. Sixth Inter. Congress Genetics,2, 166–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cumming Robb, R. A study of mutations in evolution. Journ. of Genetics 31, 47–52 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982279

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982279

Keywords

Navigation