Journal of Genetics

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 131–151 | Cite as

An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory I. Short-term responses to selection

With eight text-figures
  • G. A. Clayton
  • J. A. Morris
  • Alan Robertson


  1. 1.

    The paper describes the response, in the early generations, of a large random-breeding population ofDrosophila melanogaster to selection for abdominal bristle score. The main purpose of the work was an examination of the adequacy of existing theory in describing these phenomena.

  2. 2.

    Estimates of the heritability of the character by parent-offspring, full-sib and half-sib and half-sibs correlations were in. good agreement, the mean value being 0.52.

  3. 3.

    As a further 35 % of the variance in total score could be ascribed to causes affecting sternites separately, it seems very probable that the genes affecting this character act additively or nearly so. This is in agreement with the results from crosses between lines.

  4. 4.

    The responses to selection over seven generations, based either on individual or family score, were in fair agreement with predictions from these estimates with three reservations: (a) There was considerable divergence between replicate lines selected upwards, even when the degree of inbreeding was low. This may be peculiar toDrosophila, which should therefore be used with care in experiments intended for extrapolation to other species. (b) The responses to downward selection were less than expected, as a consequence of a decline in genetic variation within two or three generations. (c) The agreement with prediction was best at high intensities of selection, the response at lower intensities being below expectation.

  5. 5.

    Various of these observations are relevant to the problem of the maintenance of such variation in a population. It seems probable that the forces controlling any genetic equilibrium cannot be strong and that in this character mutation may play an important role.



Additive Genetic Variance Individual Selection High Line Family Selection Male Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, V. L. &Kempthorne, D. (1954). A model for the study of quantitative inheritance.Genetics,39, 883–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Clayton, G. A. &Robertson, A. (1955). Mutation and quantitative variation.Amer. Nat.89, 150–8.Google Scholar
  3. Cockerham, C. C. (1954). An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present.Genetics,39, 859–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crow, J. F. (1954). Breeding structure of populations, II. Effective population number.Statistics in Mathematics and Biology. Ames, U.S.A..: Iowa State Coll. Press.Google Scholar
  5. Durrant, A. &Mather, K. (1954). Heritable variation in along inbred line ofDrosophila.Genetica,27, 97–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falconer, D. S. (1953). Asymmetrical response in selection experiments.I.U.B.S. Symposium on Genetics of Population Structure.Google Scholar
  7. Mather, K. &Harrison, B. J. (1949). The manifold effect of selection.Heredity,3, 1–52 and 131-62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller, A. (1950). The internal anatomy and histology of the imago ofDrosophila melanogaster.Biology of Drosophila, ed. M. Demerec. New York; John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Rasmuson, M. (1955). Selection for bristle number in some unrelated strains ofDrosophila melanogaster.Acta Zool. Stockh.,36, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reeve, E. C. R. &Robertson, F. W. (1954). Studies in quantitative inheritance. VI. Stemite chaeta number inDrosophila: a metameric quantitative character.Z. Vererbungslehre, 86, 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Robertson, A. (1955). Selection in animals, synthesis;Symposia on Quantitative Biology, XX. Cold Spring Harbor.Google Scholar
  12. Robertson, A. (1956). The effect of selection against extreme deviants based on deviation or on homozygosis.Genetics (in the Press).Google Scholar
  13. Tebb, G. &Thoday, J. M. (1954). Stability in development and relational balance of X chromosomes inDrosophila melanogaster.Nature, Lond.,174, 1109–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating. I-V.Genetics,6, 111–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1957

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Clayton
    • 1
  • J. A. Morris
    • 1
  • Alan Robertson
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Animal GeneticsEdinburgh

Personalised recommendations