Protecting peppers from aphid-borne viruses with aluminum foil or plastic mulch
Aluminum foil and plastic mulch, covering 57-83% of the ground in peppers from emergence, effectively protected the crop against aphid-borne cucumber mosaic and potato virus Y by repelling winged aphids. Aluminum foil and grey plastic sheets gave the best results, followed closely by white plastic on black. The mulches were most efficient during the first 3 weeks in the field, after which they lost some of their reflectance. Trappings of winged aphids from the aluminum-covered plots during the first 3 weeks were only 2 and 5% of the control, and those in the grey-plastic-covered plots were between 6 and 12%.Myzus persicae was especially sensitive to reflection, and trappings in the aluminum and grey plastic plots during the first 3 weeks were less than 0.6 and 2% of the control, respectively. Repellence of winged aphids was correlated with virus incidence, especially during years with high natural virus spread; infection rates in the mulched plots at harvest time reached only 4.5-6% compared with 45% in the controls. As a result, yields were markedly higher except in the aluminum-mulched plot where in one season growth of plants was retarded, perhaps due to lower soil temperature.
Key WordsViruses aphid-borne control by reflective surfaces reflective surfaces in control of aphid-borne viruses
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Adleiz, W.C. andEverett, P.H. (1968) Aluminium foil and white polyethylene mulches to repel aphids and control watermelon mosaic.J. econ. Ent. 61: 1276–1279.Google Scholar
- 2.Alper, M., Levy, S. andLoebenstein, G. (1973) [Mulches to repel aphids from peppers.]Hassadeh 53: 529–531. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
- 3.Alpei, M. andLoebenstein, G. (1966) Trappings of flying aphids in several areas of Israel, as a guide to growing virus-free potato and iris stocks.Israel J. agric. Res. 16: 143–146.Google Scholar
- 4.Alper, M., Loebenstein, G. andLevy, S. (1970 [Reflective surfaces to repel aphids and control virus spread.]Hassadeh 52: 116–118. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
- 5.Johnson, G.V., Bing, A. andSmith, F.F. (1967) Reflective surfaces used to repel dispersing aphids and reduce spread of aphid-borne cucumber mosaic virus in gladiolus plantings.J. econ. Ent. 60: 16–18.Google Scholar
- 6.Jones, F.R. andChapman, R.K. (1968) Aluminum foil and other reflective surfaces to manipulate the movement of aphid vectors of plant viruses.Proc. N. cent. Brch Am. Ass. econ. Ent. 23: 146–148.Google Scholar
- 7.Kring, J.B. (1964) New ways to repel aphids.Front. Pl. Sci. 17: 6–7.Google Scholar
- 9.Moore, W.D., Smith, F.F., Johnson, G.V. andWolfenbarger, D.O. (1965) Reduction of aphid populations and delayed incidence of virus infection on yellow straight-neck squash by the use of aluminum foil.Proc. Fla St. hort. Soc. 78: 187–191.Google Scholar
- 10.Munsell Color Company. (1966) Book of Color. Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
- 11.Smith, F.F., Johnson, G.V., Kahn, R.P. andBing, A. (1964) Repellency of reflective aluminium to transient aphid virus-vectors.Phytopathology 54: 748 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
- 12.Smith, F.F. andWebb, R.E. (1969) Soil mulches for repelling Mexican bean beetles.Proc. 9th Natl. Agric. Plastics Conf., pp. 59–61.Google Scholar