Skip to main content
Log in

Cropping systems for the management of phytonematodes

  • Minireview
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Damage caused by nematodes is one of the limiting factors in crop production. Traditional nematode management is based on the use of crop rotations, resistant cultivars, nematicides, or combinations of these methods. For a crop like peanut (Arachis hypogaea), cultivars resistant to root-knot nematodes are not available. There are soybean (Glycine max) cultivars resistant to some of the species of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.); however, most fields have nematode infestations composed of mixtures of species. Research at Auburn has shown that tropical crops can be used effectively in rotation to manage nematode problems. Rotations with American jointvetch (Aeschynomene americana), castor (Ricinus communis), hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta), partridge pea (Cassia fasciculata), sesame (Sesamum indicum), and velvetbean (Mucuna deeringiana) have resulted in good nematode control and increased yields of peanut and soybean. Some crops (castor, sesame) are considered ‘active’ in that they produce compounds that are nematicidal, whereas others (e.g. corn, sorghum) are simply non-host, that is, ‘passive’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atwal, A.S. and Mangar, M. (1969) Repellent action of root exudates ofSesamum orientale against the root-knot nematodeMeloidogyne arenaria (Heteroderidae, Nematoda).Indian J. Entomol. 31:286.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, E.B. (1978) Cultural and biological control methods. in: Southey, J.F. [Ed.] Plant Nematology. pp. 269–282. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, R.J. and Barker, K.F. (1983) The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Curl, E.A. (1963) Control of plant diseases by crop rotation.Bot. Rev. 29:413–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gommers, F.J. and Bakker, J. (1988) Physiological diseases induced by plant responses or products, in: Poinar, G.O.Jr. and Jansson, H.B. [Eds.] Diseases of Nematodes. Vol. 1, pp. 3–22. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grainge, M. and Ahmed, S. (1988) Handbook of Plants with Pest-Control Properties. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Granados Alvarez, N. (1989) La Rotación con Leguminosas corno Alternativa para Reducir el Daño Causado por Fitopatógenos del Suelo y Elevar la Producción del Agrosistema Maíz en el Trópico Húmedo. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias. Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, México.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heald, C.M. (1987) Classical nematode management practices. in: Veech, J.A. and Dickson, D.W. [Eds.] Vistas on Nematology. pp. 100–104. Society of Nematologists, Hyattsville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jairajpuri, M.S., Alam, M.M. and Ahmad, I. (1990) Nematode Biocontrol. CBS Publishers, Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, A.W. (1982) Managing nematode populations in crop production. in: Nematology in the Southern Region of the United States.South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 276:193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lear, B. (1959) Application of castor pomace and cropping of castor to reduce nematode populations.Plant Dis. Rep. 43:459–460.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McBeth, C.W. and Taylor, A.L. (1944) Immune and resistant cover crops valuable in root-knot-infested peach orchards.Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 45:158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCann, J., Luedders, V.D. and Dropkin, V.H. (1982) Selection and reproduction of soybean cyst nematodes on resistant soybeans.Crop Sci. 22:78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nusbaum, C.J. and Ferris, H. (1973) The role of cropping systems in nematode population management.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 11:423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Porter, D.M., Smith, D.H. and Rodríguez-Kábana, R. (1982) Peanut plant diseases. in: Pattee, H.E. and Young, C.T. [Eds.] Peanut Science and Technology. pp. 326–410. American Peanut Research and Education Society, Yoakum, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, D.M., Smith, D.H. and Rodríguez-Kábana, R. (1984) Compendium of Peanut Diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rich, J.R., Rahi, G.S., Opperman, C.H. and Davis, E.L. (1989) Influence of castor (Ricinus communis) lectin (ricin) on motility ofMeloidogyne incognita.Nematropica 19:99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riggs, R.D. (1982) Cyst nematodes in the southern U.S.A. in: Nematology in the Southern Region of the United States.South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 276:75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodríguez-Kábana, R. and Ivey, H. (1986) Crop rotation systems for the management ofMeloidogyne arenaria in peanuts.Nematropica 16:53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Ivey, H. and Backman, P.A. (1987) Peanut-cotton rotations for the management ofMeloidogyne arenaria.J. Nematol. 19:484–486.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rodríguez-Kábana, R. and King, P.S. (1985) Evaluation of selected nematicides for control ofMeloidogyne arenaria in peanut: a multi-year study.Nematropica 15:155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., King, P.S., Robertson, D.G. and Weaver, C.F. (1989) Potential of crops uncommon to Alabama for management of root-knot and soybean cyst nematodes.Ann. Appl. Nematol. 2:116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., King, P.S., Robertson, D.G., Weaver, C.F. and Carden, E.L. (1988) New crops with potential for management of soybean nematodes.Nematropica 18:45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Robertson, D.G., Wells, L., King, P.S. and Weaver, C.F. (1989) Crops uncommon to Alabama for the management ofMeloidogyne arenaria in peanut.Suppl. J. Nematol. (Ann. Appl. Nematol.) 21:712–716.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Robertson, D.G., Wells, L. and Young, R.W. (1988) Hairy indigo for the management ofMeloidogyne arenaria in peanut.Nematropica 18:137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rodríguez-Kábana, R. and Touchton, J.T.. (1984) Corn and sorghum as rotational crops for management ofMeloidogyne arenaria in peanut.Nematropica 14:26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rodríguez-Kábana, R. and Weaver, D.B. (1989) The management of plant-parasitic nematodes in soybean: rotations and cultivars.Proc. IV World Soybean Res. Conf., (Buenos Aires), pp. 1454–1459.

  28. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Weaver, D.B., García, R., Robertson, D.G. and Carden, E.L. (1989) Bahiagrass for the management of root-knot and cyst nematodes in soybean.Nematropica 19:185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Weaver, D.B., Robertson, D.G. and Ivey, H. (1988) Bahiagrass for the management ofMeloidogyne arenaria in peanut.Ann. Appl. Nematol. 2:110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Weaver, D.B., Robertson, D.G., King, P.S. and Carden, E.L. (1990) Sorghum in rotation with soybean for the management ofHeterodera glycines andMeloidogyne arenaria. Nematropica 20:111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Weaver, D.B., Robertson, D.G., Young, R.W. and Carden, E.L. (1990) Rotations of soybean with two tropical legumes for the management of nematode problems.Nematropica 20:101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rohde, R.A. and Jenkins, W.R. (1958) Basis for resistance ofAsparagus officinalis var.altilis to the stubby-root nematodeTrichodorus christiei Allen.Md. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. A-97:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sasser, J.N. (1979) Pathogenicity, hosts ranges and variability ofMeloidogyne. in: Lamberti, F. and Taylor, C.E. [Eds.] Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne species) Systematics, Biology, and Control. pp. 256–268. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sasser, J.N. and Carter, C.C. (1982) Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) identification, ecology, and control. in: Nematology of the Southern Region of the United States.South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 276:21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schippers, B. and Gams, W. (1979) Soil-borne Plant Pathogens. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sinclair, J.B. and Backman, P.A. (1989) Compendium of Soybean Diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Trivedi, P.C. and Barker, K.R. (1986) Management of nematodes by cultural practices.Nematropica 16:213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vicente, N.E. and Acosta, N. (1987) Effects ofMucuna deeringiana onMeloidogyne incognita.Nematropica 17:99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weaver, D.B., Rodríguez-Kábana, R. and Carden, E.L. (1989) Long-term effect of crop rotation on soybean in a field infested withMeloidogyne arenaria andHeterodera glycines.J. Nematol. 21:720–722.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weaver, D.B., Rodríguez-Kábana, R., Robertson, D.G., Akridge, R.L. and Carden, E.L. (1989) Effect of crop rotation on soybean in a field infested withMeloidogyne arenaria andHeterodera glycines. Suppl. J. Nematol. (Ann. Appl. Nematol.) 21:720–722.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez-kábana, R., Canullo, G.H. Cropping systems for the management of phytonematodes. Phytoparasitica 20, 211–224 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980843

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980843

Key Words

Navigation