Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An economic comparison of pesticide application regimes for processing tomatoes

  • Guest Editorial
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a field experiment aimed at the management of pests, diseases and weeds in tomato agroecosystems using a recommended range of pesticide applications compared with lower chemical input systems, the economics of pesticide use on processing tomatoes in Ohio, USA, was evaluated in 1994 and 1995. The pesticide regimes used included: (i) full-spectrum recommended pesticide use, based on a comprehensive pesticide application schedule including insecticides (carbaryl, endosulfan and esfenvalerate), a fungicide (chlorothalonil) and herbicides (trifluralin and paraquat); (ii) insecticides only, based on applications of the same insecticides and doses used in (i); (iii) fungicides and herbicides only, based on applications of the same fungicides and herbicides used in (i); and (iv) control plots, which received no pesticide applications. All of the costs involved in applying pesticides (chemicals, machinery, labor) were recorded for all treatments for the economic analysis. Overall, the fungicide treatments resulted in higher yields than either the control or the insecticides-only regime, and the profits from the full-spectrum pesticide and fungicide & herbicide regimes were greater than those from the insecticide-only regime and controls in 1994. The yields and profits from all pesticide regimes were substantially less in 1995 than in 1994.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babcock, B.A., Lichtenberg, E. and Zilberman, D. (1992) Impact of damage control and quality of output: estimating pest control effectiveness.Am. J. Agric. Econ. 74:163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhowmik, P.C. and Deddy, K.N. (1988) Effects of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa cruss-galli) on growth, yield and nutrient status of transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).Weed Sci. 36:775–778.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brammal, R.D. (1993) Effect of foliar fungicide treatment on early blight and yield of fresh market tomato in Ontario.Plant Dis. 77:484–488.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brun, L.O. (1981) Experimentation de nauf insecticides destinés à la protection des cultures de tomates en Nouvelle-Calodinie.Cah. O.R.S.T.O.M. ser. Biol. 44:35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byrne, J.M., Hausbeck, M.S. and Latin, R.X. (1997) Efficacy and economics of management strategies to control anthracnose fruit rot in processing tomatoes in the Midwest.Plant Dis. 81:1167–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edelson, J.V., Cartwright, B. and Royer, T.A. (1989) Economics of controlling onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on onions with insecticides in south Texas.J. Econ. Entomol. 82:561–564.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrandino, F. and Elmer, W.H. (1992) Reduction in tomato yield due to Septoria leaf spot.Plant Dis. 76:208–211.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fox, G. and Weersink, A. (1995) Damage control and increasing returns.Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77:33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaynor, J.D., Hamill, A.S. and Mac Tavish, D.C. (1993) Efficacy, fruit residues, and soil dissipation of the herbicide metolachlor in processing tomato.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 118:68–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harding, J. (1971) Field comparison of insecticidal sprays for control of four tomato insects in South Texas.J. Econ. Entomol. 64:1302–1304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Headley, J.C. (1972) Economics of agricultural pest control.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 17:273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karel, A.K. and Ashimogo, G.C. (1991) Economics of insect control on common beans and soybeans in Tanzania.J. Econ. Entomol. 84:996–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy, G.G., Romanov, L.R., Jenkins, S.F. and Sanders, D.C. (1983) Insects and diseases damaging tomato fruits in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:168–173.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lambdin, P.L. and Snodderly, L.J. (1984) Green peach aphid control on tomato with foliar applied insecticides.Tenn. Farm Home Sci. 132:6–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lange, W.H. and Bronson, L. (1981) Insect pests of tomatoes.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26:345–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masiunas, J.B., Weston, L.A. and Weller, S.C. (1995) The impact of rye cover crops on weed populations in a tomato cropping system.Weed. Sci. 43:318–323.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mishra, P.N. (1984) Studies on bio-efficacy of some insecticides against the pest complex of tomato,Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. Pusaruby.Madras Agric. J. 71:673–676.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perez, F.G.M. and Masiunas, J.B. (1990) Eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) interference in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).Weed Sci. 38:385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pernezny, K., Datnoff, L.E. and Collins, J. (1994) Yield losses associated with foliar diseases of fresh-market tomatoes in Florida and benefits of protectant fungicides.Phytopathology 84:1141 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pernezny, K., Datnoff, L.E., Mueller, T. and Collins, J. (1996) Losses in fresh-market tomato production in Florida due to target spot and bacterial spot and the benefits of protectant fungicides.Plant Dis. 80:559–563.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pimentel, D., McLaughlin, L., Zepp, A., Lakitan, B., Kraus, T., Kleinman, P.et al. (1993) Environmental and economic effects of reducing pesticide use in agriculture.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 46:273–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pimentel, D., Terhune, E.C., Dritschillo, W., Gallahan, D., Kinner, N., Nafus, D.et al. (1977) Pesticides, insects in foods, and cosmetic standards.Bioscience 37:178–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Poehling, H.M. (1988) Influence of cereal aphid control on aphid specific predators in winter wheat.Entomol. Gen. 13:163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Poysa, V., Brammal, R.A. and Pitblado, R.E. (1993) Effects of foliar fungicide sprays on disease and yield of processing tomatoes in Ontario.Can. J. Plant Sci. 73:1209–1215.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Quaglia, F., Rossi, E., Petacchi, R. and Taylor, C.E. (1993) Observations on an infestation by green peach aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on greenhouse tomatoes in Italy.J. Econ. Entomol. 8:1019–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reed, J.P., Hall, F.R. and Riedel, R.M. (1993) Biological implications of drift from sprayers in tomato fungicide field trials.Plant Dis. 77:186–189.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singh, K.J. and Singh, O.P. (1991) Efficacy and economics of some insecticides against jassid,Apheliona maculosa Dist. infestation on soybean.J. Insect. Sci. 4:187–189.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trumble, J.T. and Alvardo-Rodriguez, B. (1993) Development and economic evaluation of an IPM program for fresh market tomato production in Mexico.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 43:267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trumble, J.T., Carson, W.G. and White, K.K. (1994) Economic analysis of aBacillus thuringiensis-based integrated pest management program in fresh-market tomatoes.J. Econ. Entomol. 87:1463–1469.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Trumble J.T. and Morse, J.P. (1993) Economics of integrating the predaceous mitePhytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with pesticides in strawberries.J. Econ. Entomol. 86:879–885.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walgenbach, J.F. and Estes, E.A. (1992) Economics of insecticide use on staked tomatoes in western North Carolina.J. Econ. Entomol. 85:888–894.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walgenbach, J.F., Leidly, R.B. and Sheets, T.J. (1991) Persistence of insecticides on tomato foliage and implications for control of tomato fruitworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 84:978–986.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Walgenbach, J.F., Shoemaker, P.B. and Sorenson, K.A. (1989) Timing pesticide applications for control ofHeliothis zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae),Alternaria solani (Ell. and G. Martin) Sor., andPhytophthora infestans (Mont.) De Bary, on tomatoes in western North Carolina.J. Agric. Entomol. 6:159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weaver, S.E., Smits, N. and Tan, C.S. (1987) Estimating yield losses of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) caused by nightshade (Solanum spp.) interference.Weed Sci. 35:163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weaver, S.E. and Tan, C.S. (1983) Critical period of weed interference in transplanted tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum): Growth analysis.Weed Sci. 31:476–481.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wiesenborn, W.D., Trumble, J.T. and Oatman, E.R. (1990) Economic comparison of insecticide treatment programs for managing tomato pinworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on fall tomatoes.J. Econ. Entomol. 83:212–216.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wightman, J.A., Anders, M.M., Rao, V.R. and Reddy, L.M. (1995) Management ofHelicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on chickpea in southern India: thresholds and the economics of host plant resistance and insecticide application.Crop Prot. 14:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wolk, J.O., Kretchman, D.W. and Ortega, D.G. (1983) Response of tomato to defoliation.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108:536–540.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yardım, E.N. and Edwards, C.A. (1998) The influence of chemical management of pests, diseases and weeds on pest and predatory arthropods associated with tomatoes.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 70:31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ziraat Fakultesi, Bitki Koruma Bolumu, Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi, 65080, Van, Turkey

    Erdal N. Yardım

  2. Dept. of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 43210-1220, Columbus, OH, USA

    Clive A. Edwards

Authors
  1. Erdal N. Yardım
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clive A. Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdal N. Yardım.

Additional information

http://www.phytoparasitica.org posting Dec. 17, 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yardım, E.N., Edwards, C.A. An economic comparison of pesticide application regimes for processing tomatoes. Phytoparasitica 31, 51–60 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979766

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979766

Key words

Search

Navigation