Abstract
Allocation in joint production is still one of the unresolved and often discussed methodological issues in Life Cycle Inventory Analysis. Using the many years of experience of man agement sciences, a new classification scheme is proposed. It is postulated that companies perform allocation in joint production in view of optimising the products’ performance (economic and/ or environmental), which helps them to maximise their profits. Therefrom it is derived that value judgements and negotiations are inevitable. The proposed classification scheme differentiates between the number of decision-makers involved, and the type of markets for joint products. Several decision-makers have to find fair allocation factors for their commonly operated joint production, whereas individual decision-makers may choose allocation factors considering the (economic and/ or environmental) competitiveness of their joint products. Applied on the case of a small-scale gas-fuelled combined heat and power plant, the methodology proposed shows a strong dependency on the disutility function, i.e., private costs, environmental damage costs or a combination of the two.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous (1998): Environmental management. Life Cycle Assessment. Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis, ISO 14041, International Organization for Standardization (Ed.), AFNOR, France
Azapagic, A. (1996): Environmental System Analysis: The Application of Linear Programming to Life Cycle Assessment, Volume I, Centre of Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey
Boustead, I. (1994): Co-product Allocation in Chlorine Plants, Report 5, Eco-profiles of the European polymer industry, Association of Plastics Manufacturers in Europe (APME), Brussels
European Commission DGXII, Science, Research and Development JOULE (1995a): ExternE, Externalities of Energy. Vol. 1. Summary, Luxembourg
European Commission DGXII, Science, Research and Development JOULE (1995b): ExternE, Externalities of Energy. Vol. 2. Methodology, Luxembourg
European Commission DGXII, Science, Research and Development JOULE (1995c): ExternE, Externalities of Energy. Vol. 3. Coal and Lignite, Luxembourg
European Commission DGXII, Science, Research and Development JOULE (1995d): ExternE, Externalities of Energy. Vol. 4. Oil and Gas, Luxembourg
European Commission DGXII, Science, Research and Development JOULE (1995c): ExternE, Externalities of Energy. Vol. 5. Nuclear, Luxembourg
European Commission DGXII, Science, Research and Development JOULE (1995f): ExternE, Externalities of Energy. Vol. 6. Wind and Hydro, Luxembourg
Eyre, N.;Downing, T.;Hoekstra, R.;Rennings, K.;Tol, R.S.J. (1997): Global Warming Damages, Final Report, ExternE Global Warming Subtask, The European Commission, Luxembourg
Fava, J.A.;Denison, R.;Jones, B.;Curran, M.A.;Vigon, B.;Selke, S.;Barnum, J. (eds.) (1991): A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessments, SETAC-Workshop during 18.-23. August, 1990 in Smugglers Notch, Vermont, Washington D.C.
Frischknecht, R. (1998a): Life Cycle Inventory Analysis for Decision-Making; Scope-dependent Inventory System Models and Context-specific Joint Product Allocation, ETH Ph.D.-thesis Nr. 12599, Uster
Frischknecht, R. (1998b): Allokation in der Sachbilanz bei starrer Kuppelproduktion, in R. Frischknecht, S. Hellweg (Eds.), ökobilanz-Allokationsmethoden. Modelle aus der Kosten- und Produktionstheorie sowie praktische Probleme in der Abfallwirtschaft. Vorbereitende Unterlagen des 7. Diskussionsforums ökobilanzen vom 24. Juni 1998 an der ETH Zurich. Laboratorium für Technische Chemie, Gruppe Sicherheit und Umweltschutz, ETH Zürich, pp. 38–49
Goedkoop, M. (1995): The Eco-indicator 95; Final Report, PRé Consultants B.V., Amersfoort
Goedkoop, M.;Spriensma, R. (1999): The Eco-indicator 99; A damage-oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report, PRe Consultants B.V., Amersfoort
Horngren, C.T.;Foster, G. (1991): Cost Accounting, A Managerial Emphasis, 7th edition, Prentice Hall International Inc.
Krewitt, W.;Heck, T.;Boyd, R.;Eyre, N. (1997): Aggregation — External Costs from Electricity Generation in Germany and the UK, Final Report, Stuttgart
Lindeors, L.-G.;Christiansen, K.;Hoffman, L.;Virtanen, Y.;Juntilla, V.;Hanssen, O.-J.;Rønning, A.;Ekvall, T.;Finnveden, G. (1995):Allocation;Technical Report No 7.in Lindfors, L.-G.;Christiansen, K.;Hoffman, L.;Virtanen, Y.;Juntilla, V.;Leskinen, A.;Hanssen, O.-J.;Rønning, A.;Ekvall, T.;Finnveden, G.: LCA-Nordic; Technical Reports No 1–9. Nordic Council of Ministers, TemaNord 1995:502, Copenhagen
Mill, J.S. (1848): Principles of Political Economy; With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, Vol. II, John W. Parker, West Strand, London
Müller-Furstenberg, G. (1998): Kostenallokation bei starrer Kuppelproduktion, in R. Frischknecht, S. Hellweg (Hrsg.) ökobilanz-Allokationsmethoden; Modelle aus der Kosten und Produktionstheorie sowie praktische Probleme in der Abfallwirtschaft, vorbereitende Unterlagen zum 7. Diskussionsforum ökobilanzen vom 24. Juni 1998, ETH Zürich
Schneider, F. (1996): Analyse des Réemplois, Récyclages, Valorisations de Déchets par l’Etude de Systèmes Cascade, Thèse 96ISAL0132, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Shapley, L.S. (1953): A value for n-persons games, in A.W. Kuhn, A.W. Tucker (ed.) Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. II, Princeton University Press, p. 307–317
Udo de Haes, H.A.;DE Snoo, G.R. (1996): Environmental Certification; Companies and Products: Two Vehicles for a Life Cycle Approach, Int. J. LCA 1 (3), p. 168–170
van Engelenburg, B.C.W.;Nieuwlaar, E. (1994): A framework for a just allocation procedure, in G. Huppes, F. Schneider (ed.), Proceedings of the European Workshop on Allocation in LCA, Feb. 24–25, Leiden 1994, p. 102–119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presentation and Introduction of this set of articles see Int. J. LCA 4 (3) 175–179 (1999)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frischknecht, R. Allocation in Life Cycle Inventory Analysis for Joint Production. Int. J. LCA 5, 85–95 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979729
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979729