Advertisement

The MIIM LCA PH.D. club: Presentation and introduction

  • Karin AnderssonEmail author
  • Henrikke BaumannEmail author
  • Sarah CowellEmail author
  • Göran FinnvedenEmail author
  • Rolf FrischknechtEmail author
  • Patrick HofstetterEmail author
  • Åsa JönssonEmail author
  • Sven LundieEmail author
  • Arnold TukkerEmail author
Article

Abstract

During 1998, the number of completed Ph.D.s on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) seemed to be larger than any previous year. In order to mark this achievement, a special series is being published in the International Journal of LCA. In this introductory paper, the Class of MUM outline the results of their research work over the last few years. A number of common points and tendencies have emerged through this work. First of all, the scope-dependency of LCA models: some of us have discerned in particular the need to distinguish between descriptive and change-oriented LCAs. Secondly, a number of the theses focus on the interaction between LCA and decision-making. Thirdly, the benefits of pluralism in impact assessment and allocation have been advocated in some of the theses. Finally, it may be noted that in these theses structuring the management of controversial issues seems to be preferred to eliminating such issues by a process of harmonisation. Future papers will map out the intellectual journeys undertaken in the development of these theses and discuss key findings in more detail.

Keywords

Agriculture building decision making context food LCA LCI Life Cycle Assessment Life Cycle Inventory participatory decision making Ph.D.s of 1998 subjectivity uncertainty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, K. (1998): Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Food Products and Production Systems. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumann, H. (1998): Life Cycle Assessment and Decision Making: Theories and Practices. Technical Environmental Planning, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  3. Coweil, S.J. (1998): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Agricultural Systems: Integration Into Decision-Making. Ph.D. dissertation. Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Jönsson, Å. (1998): Life Cycle Assessment of Building Products. Case Studies and Methodology. Technical Environmental Planning, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  5. Finnvkden, G. (1998): On the Possibilities of Life Cycle Assessment. Development of Methodology and Review of Case Studies. Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  6. Frischknecht, R. (1998): Life Cycle Inventory Analysis for Decision Making. Scope Dependent Inventory Models and Contex-specific Joint Product Allocation. ETH Zürich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofstetter, P. (1998): Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. A Structured Approach to Combine Models of the Technosphere, Eco-sphere and Valuesphere. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/ Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Lundie, S. (1999): Ökobilanzierung und Entscheidungstheorie -Praxis-orientierte Produktbewertung unter Berücksichtigung gesellschaftlicher Werthaltungen. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, Singapur. Trade version of a Ph.D. thesis defended in Winter 1998Google Scholar
  9. Solberc-Johansen, B. (1998): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle. Ph.D. dissertation. Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Ros, M. (1998): Unsicherheit und Fuzziness in ökologischen Bewertungen- Orientierungen zu einer robusten Praxis der Ökobilanzierung, Diss. ETH Nr.12726, ETH Zürich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Sonesson, U. (1998): Systems Analysis of Waste Management — The ORWARE Model, Transport and Compost Sub-Models. Agraria 130, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  12. Tukker, A. (1999): Frames in the Toxicity Controversy. Risk Assessment and Policy Analysis Related to the Dutch Chlorine Debate and the Swedish PVC-Debate. Published in 1999 by Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London. Trade version of a Ph.D. thesis defended in Autumn 1998Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIT Ekologik, Chalmers TeknikparkGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Technical environmental planningChalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden
  3. 3.Centre for Environmental StrategyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  4. 4.Fms (Environmental Strategies Research Group)National Defence Research Establishment (FOA)StockholmSweden
  5. 5.ESU-servicesZentralstrasse 8UsterSwitzerland
  6. 6.Natural and Social Science InterfaceETH-Zentrum HAD F1ZürichSwitzerland
  7. 7.School of ArchitectureChalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden
  8. 8.Centre for Water and Waste TechnologyUniversity of New South Wales, CRC for Waste Management and Pollution ControlSydneyAustralia
  9. 9.TNO-STBJA DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations