Skip to main content

Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories

Abstract

Marginal technologies are defined as the technologies actually affected by the small changes in demand typically studied in prospective, comparative life cycle assessments. Using data on marginal technologies thus give the best reflection of the actual consequences of a decision. Furthermore, data on marginal technologies are easier to collect, more precise, and more stable in time than data on average technologies. A 5-step procedure is suggested to identify the marginal technologies. The step-wise procedure first clarifies the situation in which the marginal should apply, and then identifies what specific technology is marginal in this situation. The procedure is illustrated in two examples: European electricity production and pulp and paper production.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bergstedt A (1994): Fremstilling af træmasse. Lecture notes. Copenhagen: Royal Agricultural University

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstedt A (personal communication): Royal Agricultural University, Denmark

  3. Clift R, Frischknecht R, Huppes G, Tillman A-M, Weidema B P (1998): Towards a coherent approach to life cycle inventory analysis. Brussels: SETAC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ekvall T, Frees N, Nielsen P H, Person L, Ryberg A, Weidema B, Wesnaes M, Widheden J (1998): Life cycle assessment of packaging systems for beer and soft drinks. Main report. Copenhagen: Miljøstyrelsen

    Google Scholar 

  5. Energistyrclsen (1995): Teknologidata for elog varmeproduktionsanlseg. Copenhagen: Energistyrelsen

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission (1995): Nuclear Industries in the Community — The nuclear power station design and construction industry and completion of the European market. Information energy Europe sheet 23. Brussels: European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission (1996): European Energy to 2020: A scenario approach. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Commission (1997): Energy policies and trends in the European Community. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eurostat (1997a): Energy Balance Sheets 1994-1995. Luxembourg: Statistical Office of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eurostat (1997b): Energy Yearly Statistics 1995. Luxembourg: Statistical Office of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  11. FAO (1997): State of worlds forests. http://www.fao.org/waicent/faoinfo/forestry/sofotoc.htm

  12. Frees N, Weidema B P (1998): Life cycle assessment of packaging systems for beer and soft drinks. Technical Report 7: Energy and transport scenarios. Copenhagen: Miljøstyrelsen

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frischknecht R (1998): Life cycle inventory analysis for decision making. Ph.D. thesis. Zurich: ETH-Zentrum/UNL

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammar T (1997): Nordisk elmarked på vej mod år 2000. Energinyt 8(2):14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karlson L (personal communication): Swedish Paper and Cellulose Engineers Association (SPCI)

  16. Larsen H (personal communication): Sjællandske Kraftværker, Denmark

  17. Lindfors L-G, Christiansen K, Hoffmann L, Virtanen Y, Juntilla V, Hanssen O-J, Rønning A, Ekvall T (1995): Average/marginal considerations. LCA-NORDIC Technical reports No 6. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. (TemaNord 1995:502)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nordel (1996) Annual report 1996. Helsinki: Nordel

    Google Scholar 

  19. OECD (1997): Energy statistics of OECD countries 1994-95. Paris: OECD

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tillman A-M (1998): Significance of decision making for LCA methodology. Key-note lecture at the 8th Annual Meeting of SETAC-Europe, 1998.04.14-18, Bordeaux

  21. Tillman A-M,Svingby M,Lundström H (1998): Life cycle assessment of municipal waste water systems — A case study. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (in press)

  22. Tsuomis, G (1991): Science and technology of wood. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold

    Google Scholar 

  23. Udo de Haes H A, Clift R, Griesshammer R, Grisel L, Jensen A A (1996): Practical guidelines for life cycle assessment for the EU ecolabelling programme. Leiden: CML, Leiden University

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weidema B P (1993): Market aspects in product life cycle inventory methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 1(3–4):161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weidema B P (1997): Environmental assessment of products. A textbook. 3rd edition. Helsinki: UETP-EEE (Fax: +358 92291 2911)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weidema B P (1998): Application typologies for life cycle assessment — A review. Int. J. LCA 3 (4): 237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weidema B P, Wesnaes M S, Erichsen H L, Rydberg T, Eriksson E, Person P, Frees N (1997): Life cycle assessment of packaging systems for beer and soft drinks. Report A: Definition of Goal and scope. Results of the preliminary investigation. Copenhagen: Miljøstyrelsen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bo P. Weidema, Niels Frees or Anne-Merete Nielsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weidema, B.P., Frees, N. & Nielsen, AM. Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories. Int. J. LCA 4, 48–56 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979395

Download citation

Keywords

  • European electricity scenario
  • marginal technology
  • LCA
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
  • methodology
  • marginal technology
  • marginal technology
  • LCA
  • pulp and paper production
  • marginal technology
  • LCA