A Critical appraisal of the PRF ANDRO scale
- 26 Downloads
A factor analysis of the PRF ANDRO reveals a structure reflecting the PRF scales from which the items came. It is argued that there is little value in combining a conglomeration of items from different Personality Research Form scales as has been done with the MASCUL and FEMIN scales of the PRF ANDRO. Rather, relevant intact PRF scales should be considered as separate predictors, for example in regression equations. Alternatively, if single scales are required to represent masculinity and femininity, it is suggested that PRF dominance and nurturance, the scales from which MASCUL and FEMIN draw a plurality of their items respectively, are more suitable than the two PRF ANDRO scales. These latter scales are less internally consistent and show less convergence with other sex-role scales than PRF dominance and nurturance.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bem, S.L. (1976). Probing the promise of androgyny. In A.G. Kaplan & J.P. Bean (eds.), Beyond Sex Role Stereotypes: Readings towards a Psychology of Androgyny. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- Berzins, S.L., Welling, M.A. & Wetter, R.E. (1977). The PRF ANDRO Scale User's Manual (Revised). Unpublished paper, University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A.H. (1967). Involvement as a determinant of response to favorable and unfavorable information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 7(3, Pt 2).Google Scholar
- Jackson, D. (1974). Personality Research Form Manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar