Skip to main content
Log in

Life cycle impact assessment of the average passenger vehicle in the Netherlands

  • LCA Case Studies
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal, Scope and Background

In this article, the Life Cycle Impact Assessment of the average passenger vehicle of the Netherlands is performed, with emphasis on the current dismantling and recycling practice in this country. From calculations on recovery rates of the several material streams from ELY (End-of-Live Vehicle) recycling, it seems that attaining the European ELV legislation recycling targets (Directive 2000/53/EC 2000) is very difficult, even for countries with advanced collection and recycling infrastructures such as the Netherlands. An LCA of the current average passenger vehicle of the Netherlands, including a detailed modelling of the recovery and recycling should form a sound basis for comparison with alternative automotive life cycle designs and legislation efforts.

Model and System Definition

An average passenger vehicle is defined, having average weight and material composition. A cradle to grave approach is taken, including all relevant upstream processes for the production of materials and fuels, and the return of the recycled materials to the material cycles in the EOL (End-of-Life) phase. A particularity of this model is the detailed description of the Dutch collection and recycling infrastructure, with current data for the shredding, separation and metallurgical recycling processes (ARN 2000, Barkhof 1998, Chapman 1983, Püchert et al.1994, Worrel et al. 1992).

Results and Discussion

According to the Eco-indicator 99 (EI99) (Ministerie van V.R.O.M 1999), the largest environmental impact of the passenger vehicle’s life cycle occurs in the use phase — over 90% —, due to the combustion and depletion of fossil fuels. This is in agreement of previous studies (Kasai 2000, Kanesaki 2000). Also in the other life cycle phases, the use of fossil fuels is the dominant impact, even for the production phase. Resource depletion due to the use of the materials employed in the vehicle causes a comparatively lower environmental impact, namely due to the high recovery rate and efficiency of the metallurgical recycling, that balances for about 30% the total impacts of the materials production and use. NOx emission was one of the smallest emissions to air in quantity, but was responsible for 36% of the impact of the life cycle, while CO2 was the largest emission to air but caused only 6% of the environmental impact.

Conclusion and Recommendation

Although there is a growing awareness and concern on increasing the recyclability of vehicles, the use phase still has the largest environmental impact of the vehicle’s life cycle. A life cycle assessment can be a sound basis to evaluate and compare design alternatives to increase the sustainability of passenger vehicles. The ASR (Automotive shredder residue) is currently the greatest concern with regard to the recovery targets. It is a large amount of materials (about 32 wt.%), difficult and costly to recycle, and thermal recovery is limited to a maximum of 15wt.% in 1015 by the European ELV legislation. Joint efforts from the automotive industry and legislative institutions are required to find a sensible solution. LCA can be a useful tool to support legislative decisions, as purely weight-based recovery definitions are not adequate to evaluate the sustainability of the automobile life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboussouan L, Birat JP, Lorenzini P, Van Schaik A., Reuter MA, Portnoff Å (2003): Design with steel for an easy and cost-effective recycling. Proceedings of the International Electronics Recycling Congress, January 13–15 2003, Basel, Switzerland (in print)

    Google Scholar 

  • ARN (2000): Auto Recycling Nederlands millieuverslag 1999, Netherlands (in Dutch)

  • Automotive Engineering International (1) (2000): New plastics and the automobile, May 2000

  • Automotive Engineering International (2) (2000): Automotive dieting, April 2000, 52-53

  • Barkhof RHJ (1998): De vaststellen en borgen van de kritische parameters van een shredderproef voor autowrakken, Final Report GT98 A03, Delft Technical University; The Netherlands (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro MB, Remmerswaal JAM (2001): Comparison of several evaluation methods for life cycle analysis. Proceedings of the Symposium COM 2001, Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PF et al. (1983): Metal resources and energy. Butterworth Publishers, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Delft University of Technology (2000): Idemat 2000 database, The Netherlands

  • Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on end-of-life vehicles(2000): Official Journal of the European Communities, 21st October 2000

  • Kanesaki N (2000): Life Cycle Impact Assessment for a Passenger Car. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on EcoBalance, Tsukuba, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasai J (2000): Experiences and thoughts about Life Cycle Assessment in the Automotive Industry in Japan. Int J LCA 5 (5) 313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van V.R.O.M. (1999): The eco-indicator 99, a damage-oriented method for life cycle impact assessment Methodology report, The Netherlands

  • Pré Consultants (2000): Simapro 4, The Netherlands

  • Püchert H, Walter A et al. (1994): Autorecycling: Demontage und Ververtung, wirtschaftliche Aspekte, Logistik und Organization. Economica Verlag GmbH, Bonn, Germany (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelman E (1999): Sustainable transport and advanced materials, Ph.D. thesis. Eburon editors, The Netherlands

  • Worrel E, Hazewinkel O (1992): Energiekentallen in relatie tot preventie en hergebruik van afvalstromen. NOVEM report 9272, The Netherlands (in Dutch)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria B. G. Castro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castro, M.B.G., Remmerswaal, J.A.M. & Reuter, M.A. Life cycle impact assessment of the average passenger vehicle in the Netherlands. Int J LCA 8, 297–304 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978922

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978922

Keywords

Navigation