Advertisement

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial milk production

  • Merete Høgaas Eide
LCA Case Studies

Abstract

A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was carried out for milk production extending from the origin of the inputs to the agricultural step to the consumer phase and the waste management of the packaging. Three Norwegian dairies of different sizes and degree of automation were studied. The main objectives were to find any hot spots in the life cycle of milk, to determine the significance of the dairy size and degree of automation, and to study the influence of transport. The agriculture was found to be the main hot spot for almost all the environmental themes studied, although the dairy processing, packaging, consumer phase and waste management were also of importance. The consumer phase was the main contributor to photo-oxidant formation and important regarding eutrophication. The small dairy was found to have a greater environmental impact than the middle-sized and the largest dairies. The transport did not have any major influence.

Keywords

Consumer dairy dairy processing detergents distribution industrial milk production LCA life cycle assessment (LCA) milk milk farming milk packaging milk production packaging transport waste management 

References

  1. Andersson K (1998): Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Food Products and Production Systems. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden; Int J LCA 5 (4) 239–248 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audsley E (Ed); Alber S, Clift R, Cowell S, Gaillard G, Hausheer J, Jolliett O, Kleijn R, Mortensen B, Pearce D, Roger E, Teulon H, Weidema B, van Zeits H (1997): Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture. Final Report. Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-2028, Silsoe Research Institute, Bedford, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumann H, Ekvall T, Eriksson E, Kullman M, Rydberg T, Ryding S-O, Steen B, Svensson G (1993): Miljömässiga skillnader mellan återvinning/äteranvending och förbränning/deponering (Environmental comparison between recycling/re-use and incineration/ landfilling). Stiftelsen Reforsk, FoU No 79, Sweden (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  4. Cederberg C (1998): Life cycle Assessment of Milk Production—A comparison of conventional and organic farming. SIK-report No 643, SIK, The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  5. Cederberg C, Mattsson B (2000): Life Cycle Assessment of milk production—A comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8 (1) 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CORINAIR (1996): The EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook (CORINAIR 90). European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis J, Haglund C (1999): Life cycle Inventory (LCI) of Fertiliser Production. SIK-Report No 654, SIK, The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekvall T (1999): System expansion and allocation in Life Cycle Assessment. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  9. Finnveden G, Andersson-Sköld Y, Samuelsson M-O, Zetterberg L, Lindfors L-G (1992): Classification (Impact Analysis) in Connection with Life Cycle Assessment—A preliminary study. The Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 172–231Google Scholar
  10. Frees N et al. (1998): Life cycle assessment on packaging systems for beer and soft drinks. Technical Report 7: Energy and transport scenarios, Chalmers Industrial Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden and Institute for Product Development, Lyngby, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  11. Høgaas Eide M (1998): Livsløpsanalyse for transport ogproduksjon av søt konsummelk (Life Cycle Assessment of transport and production of drinking milk). SIK-report No 639, SIK, The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Sweden (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  12. Høgaas Eide M, Ohlsson T (1998): A comparison of two different approaches to inventory analysis of dairies. Int J LCA 3 (4) 209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Høgaas Eide M, Angel H, Flatemo HO, Helgesen LI, Homleid JP, Jäger WR, Sauar BO, Skjørestad AJ (1999): Livsløpsanalyse av fire metoder for CIP-vask (Life cycle Assessment of four different CIP-methods). TINE Norwegian Dairies BA, Centre for Research and Development, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  14. ISO (1998): Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis. ISO 14041:1998 (E) International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  15. Koudijs E, Dutilh C (1998): Aquatic Ecotoxicity for Common Crop Protection Aids. Int J LCA 3 (4) 200–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindfors L-G, Christiansen K, Hoffmann L, Virtanen Y, Juntilla V, Hanssen O-J, Running A, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (1995): Nordic Guidelines on Life-Cycle Assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Nord 1995-20, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  17. Mattsson B (1999): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Agricultural Food Production. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  18. Meeusen-van Onna MJG, Leneman H (1996): Toepassing van LCA voor agrarische produkten. LEI-DLO, den Haag, The Netherlands (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  19. Mekel OCL, Huppes G, Huele R, Guinée JB (1990): Environmental effects of different package systems for fresh milk. Centrum voor Milieukunde, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  20. Møller H, Høgaas M (1997): Livsløpsanalyse ved produksjon av kjøtt og melk (LCA of beef production—Assessment of combined production of milk/beef and self recruiting production of beef). OR 53.97, Østfold Research Foundation, Fredrikstad, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  21. Møller H, Vold M (1995): Livsløpsanalyse ved kjøttproduksjon—En vurdering av svine- Og lammekjøttproduksjon (Life Cycle Assessment of meat production, assessment of lamb and pork meat production). OR 53:95, Østfold Research Foundation, Fredrikstad, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  22. NAF (1998): NAF Veibok (NAF Road Map). Norges Automobil Forbund Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  23. NILF (1995): Handbok for driftsplanlegging (Agricultural economic planning guide). Norwegian Agricultural Economic Research Institute Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  24. Oterholm B, Løkkeberg Ø, Sundström G (1994): LivsLapsanalyse av ulike emballasjesystemer for konsummelkprodukter (Life Cycle Assessment of different milk packaging options). Centre for Research and Development, TINE Norwegian Dairies BA, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  25. PK-Produkter (1997): Plantevernkatalogen 1997, PK Produkter AS, Rygge, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  26. Ponsford CA (1993): Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Milk Packaging Options. Pira International, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruud SO, Skrattalsrud T, Ryntveit GO (1998): Transport og miljø i skognæringen: Skognæringens innog utgående transporter (Environmental impacts of transportation in the Norwegian forestry) Report 2a, Transportbrukernes Fellesorganisasjon, Skogavdelingen, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  28. Rydberg T, Frankenhaeuser M, Lundahl L, Otto T, Swan G, Tanner T, Hanssen O-J (1995): LCA of the Tetra Brik milk packaging system. CIT 1995:3, Chalmers Industrial Technology, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  29. Rydberg T (1997): Personal communication. Volvo Technical Development, Göteborg, Sweden. In: LCAiT (software), Chalmers Industrial Technology, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  30. Sandgren J, Heie A, Sverud T (1996): Utslipp ved håndtering av kommunalt avfall (Emissions from treatment of municipal solid waste). SFT, Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  31. Solgaard RT (2000): Miljørapport TINE Meieriene 1999 (Environmental Report of TINE Dairies 1999). TINE Norwegian Dairies, Centre for Research and Development, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  32. Tillman A-M, Baumann H, Eriksson E, Rydberg T (1991): Miljön och förpackningarna (Packaging and the environment). Statens Offentliga Utredningar 1991:77, Allmänna Förlaget, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  33. Torud E, Lang-Ree R, Rage A, Stoverud S, Sivertsen T, Ødegaard SA, Sørum H, Grave K, Austbø O, Grøndalen T, Aass RA, østerås O (1996): Strategier for å redusere forbruk av antibakterielle midler i storfeproduksjonen (Strategies to reduce the use of antibiotics in the cattle production). Norwegian Cattle Health Services, Ås, Norway (in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  34. Weidema BP, Pedersen RL, Drivsholm TS (1995): Life cycle Screening of Food Products—Two examples and some methodological proposals. Danish Academy of Technical Sciences, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  35. Personal Communications Homleid JP (1999): TINE Norwegian Dairies BA, Centre for Research and Development, Oslo, Norway, December 1999 Svensen T (2000): Norske Skog, Hurum, Norway, January 2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TINE Norwegian DairiesCentre for Research and DevelopementKalbakkenNorway

Personalised recommendations