Skip to main content
Log in

The value debate: ecodesign in a global context are there differences in global values and do they matter?

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Schmidt W-P, Sullivan J (2002): Weighting in life cycle assessments in a global context. Int J LCA 7 (1): 5–10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973): Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 4: 207–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van der Pligt J, van Schie ECM, Hoevenagel R (1998): Understanding and valuing environmental issues: The effects of availability and anchoring on judgement. Zeitschrift fuer Experimentelle Psychologie 45 (4):286–302

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baron J (1997): Biases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions. Psychological Bulletin 122 (1): 72–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofstetter P: Looking at the full picture—Implications associated with valuation. In: Bare J, Hofstetter P, Pennington D, Udo de Haes HA (eds) Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits. Proceedings of the UNEP/USEPA/CML Expert Workshop, Brighton (UK), May 25&26,2000 (in press)

  6. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000): The Eco-indicator’99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. VROM Zoetermeer, No. 1999/36A/B, 2nd ed April 2000 (http://www.pre.nl)

  7. Hofstetter P (1996): Towards a structured aggregation proce- dure. In: Braunschweig A, Förster R, Hofstetter P, Müller-Wenk R (eds) Developments in LCA valuation. IWö Diskus- sionbeitrag, St. Gallen, ppl22–211

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hofstetter P (1998): Perspectives in life cycle impact assess- ment. A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere, and valuesphere. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hofstetter P, Braunschweig A, Mettier Th, Mueller-Wenk R, Tietje O (2000): The mixing triangle: Correlation and graphi- cal decision support for LCA-based comparisons. Journal of Industrial Ecology 3 (4): 97–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finnveden G (1997): Valuation methods within LCA-Where are the values? Int J LCA 2 (3): 163–169

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hofstetter P, Scheringer M (eds) (1997): Schutzgüter undihre Abwägung aus der Sicht verschiedener Disziplinen. [Safeguard subjects and their trade-offs highlighted from the view of dif- ferent disciplines, in German] Vorbereitende Unterlagen des 5. Diskussionsforums ökobilanzen vom 17. Oktober 1997 an der ETH Zürich. Umweltnatur- und Umweltsozialwissen- schaften/ Gruppe Sicherheit und Umweltschutz, ETH Zurich

  12. Tukker A (1999): Frames in the toxicity controversy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bras-Klapwijk RM (1999): Adjusting Life Cycle Assessment methodology for use in public policy discourse. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology

  14. Hertwich EG, Hammitt JK, Pease WS (2000): A theoretical foundation for life-cycle assessment. Recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making. Journal of Indus- trial Ecology 4 (1): 13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofstetter P, Baumgartner Th, Scholz RW (2000): Modelling the valuesphere and the ecosphere: Integrating the decision makers’ perspectives into LCA. Int J LCA 5 (3):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofstetter P, Lippiatt BC, Bare JC (2002): User preferences for life cycle decision support tools: Evaluation of a survey of BEES Users. Report to be published by NIST, see http://www.bfrl. nist. gov/oae/software/bees.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Hofstetter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofstetter, P. The value debate: ecodesign in a global context are there differences in global values and do they matter?. Int J LCA 7, 62–63 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978848

Navigation