Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factual errors in the eco-indicator 95 — final report

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Goedkoop M (1995): The Eco-indicator 95 Weighting method for environmental effects that damage ecosystems or human health on a European scale-Contains 100 indicators for important materials and processes — Final Report NOH report 9523 www.pre.nl

  • Goedkoop M; Hofsetter P, Möller-Wenk R, Spriemsma R (1998): The Eco-indicator 9S, Explained Int. J. LCA 3 (6) 352–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Spriemsma R (1999): The Eco-indicator 99 A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment — Methodology Annex www.pre.nl. 108 pp

  • WHO (1987): Air Quality Guidelines for Europe, Word Health Organization Regional Publications, European Series No. 23, 426 pp

  • WHO (1996): Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2nd ed., Geneva World Health Organization, 973

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Natural Resources Canada, CANMET, 555 Booth Street, KIA 0G1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Alain Dubreuil

Authors
  1. Alain Dubreuil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Dubreuil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubreuil, A. Factual errors in the eco-indicator 95 — final report. Int. J. LCA 6, 45 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977595

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977595

Keywords

Search

Navigation