Abstract
This paper outlines some of the basic ideas of the orienting response (OR) that have developed from the classical writings of E.N. Sokolov, in particular the effects of stimulus novelty, intensity, and significance upon the OR, and predictions about these effects on a range of physiological measures traditionally associated with the OR. Such measures include the GSR, respiration, heart rate, vascular responses, EEG, and pupil diameter. Unfortunately, many of the predictions of classical OR theory do not hold up when such a fine-grain analysis is undertaken. Possible conceptualizations of the discrepancies between Sokolovian predictions and empirical data are considered—should we accept such discrepancies as merely reflecting the imperfect nature of many OR indices, or seek other regularizing principles? Preliminary Process Theory has been proposed as one alternative account of the existing data base, and similarities and differences between it and Sokolovian theory are explored. The need for further investigation of such problems, in the very foundations of OR theory, appears to be of fundamental importance to the future status of the OR. An appendix provides a discussion between Barry and Sokolov on some of these issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry, R.J. (1984) Preliminary processes in OR elicitation.Acta Psychologica, 55, 109–142.
Barry, R.J. (1987) Preliminary processes in orienting response elicitation. In P.K. Ackles, J.R. Jennings, and M.G.H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in Psychophysiology, Vol. 2. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 131–195.
Barry, R.J. (1988a) Significance and components of the orienting response: Effects of signal value versus vigilance.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 6, 343–346.
Barry, R.J. (1988b) Synthesising autonomic and event-related potential data in relation to the Orienting Response: Comment on Simons et al. (1987).Journal of Psychophysiology, 2, 293–298.
Barry, R.J., and James, A.L. (1981) Fractionation of respiratory and vascular responses with simple visual stimulation.Physiological Psychology, 9, 96–101.
Barry, R.J., Velden, M., Wolk, C., and Galvin, E. (1987) Pupillary dilation as a measure of the orienting response.Psychophysiology, 24, 578.
Bernstein, A.S., Taylor, K.W., Weinstein, E., and Reidel, J. (1985) The effect of stimulus significance on relatively sustained (tonic-like) and relatively transient (phasic-like) aspects of electrodermal, heart rate, and eyeblink response.Biological Psychology, 21, 183–228.
Groves, P.M, and Thompson, R.F. (1970) Habituation: A dual process theory.Psychological Review, 77, 419–450.
Loveless, N.E. (1979) Event-related slow potentials of the brain as expressions of orienting function. In H.D. Kimmel, E.H. van Olst, and J.F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The Orienting Reflex in Humans. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 77–100.
Maltzman, I. (1979) Orienting reflexes and significance: A reply to O’Gorman.Psychophysiology, 16, 274–282.
Simons, R.F., Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Fiorito, E., Lutzenberger, W., and Birbaumer, N. (1987) Evocation and habituation of autonomic and event-related potential responses in a nonsignal environment.Journal of Psychophysiology, 1, 45–59.
Stelmack, R.M., and Siddle, D.A.T. (1982) Pupillary dilation as an index of the orienting reflex.Psychophysiology, 19, 706–708.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
With a Comment by E.N. Sokolov
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barry, R.J. The orienting response: Stimulus factors and response measures. Pav. J. Biol. Sci. 25, 93–103 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02974263
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02974263