Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cytométrie en flux et en image: principes et applications

Flow and Image Cytometry: Principles and Applications

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Résumé

La cytométrie en flux et la cytométrie en image permettent une analyse fine des populations cellulaires, des micro-organismes ainsi que des constituants cellulaires. Ces deux techniques sont passées en quelques années d’une utilisation restreinte aux laboratoires de recherche à une utilisation routinière d’aide au diagnostique. Cet article résume les principes, les avantages et les limitations des deux techniques. Il donne aussi un bref aperçu des principales applications en recherche ou en routine.

Summary

Flow and Image Cytometry allow a high precision analysis of cell populations, microorganisms and cell components. Over few years, these two techniques evolved from a restrictive use in research laboratories to a daily use to help diagnosis. This review summarizes the principles, advantages and limitations of these two technologies. It gives an idea on the principal applications in research or clinical diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. ARNDT-JOVIN D.J., JOVIN T.M. — Multivariate chromosome analysis and complete karyotyping using dual labeling and fluorescence digital imaging microscopy.Cytometry, 1990,11, 80–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. BALDETORP B., FERNÖ M., FALLENIUS A., FALLENIUS-VECCHI G., IDVALL I., OLSSON H., SIGURDSSON H., ÅKERMAN M., KILLANDER D. — Image cytometric DNA analysis in human breast cancer analysis may add prognostic information in diploid cases with low S-phase fraction by flow cytometry.Cytometry, 1992,13, 577–585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. BROWN S. — Analysis and sorting of plant material by flow cytometry.Physiol. Veget., 1983,22, 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BUNN P., CARNEY D., GAZDAR A., WHANG-PENG J., MATTEWS M. — Diagnostic and biological implications of flow cytometric DNA content analysis in lung cancer.Cancer Res., 1983,43, 5026–5032.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. COONS A.H., KAPLAN M.H. — Localization of antigen in tissue cells. II. Improvements in a method for the detection of antigens by means of fluorescent antibody.J. Exp. Med., 1950,91, 1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. DARZYNKIEWICZ Z., STAIANO-COICO L., MELAMED M.R. — Increased mitochondrial uptake of rhodamine 123 during lymphocyte stimulation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1981,78, 2383–2387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. DARZYNKIEWICZ Z., KAPUSCINSKI J., CARTER S.P., SCHMID F.A., MELAMED M.R. — Cytostatic and cytotoxic properties of pyronin Y: relation to mitochondrial localization of the dye and its interaction with RNA.Cancer Res., 1986,46, 5760–5766.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DUPERRAY C., BOIRON J.-M., BOUCHEIX C., CANTALOUBE J.-F., LAVABRE-BERTRAND T., ATTAL M., BROCHIER J., MARANINCHI D., BATAILLE R., KLEIN B.. — The CD24 antigen discriminates between pre-B and B cells in human bone marrow.J. Immunol., 1990,145, 3678–3683.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. EL-NAGGAR A.K., BATSAKIS J.G., TEAGUE K., GARNSEY L., BARLOGIE B. — Single- and Double-stranded RNA measurements by flow cytometry in solid Neoplasms.Cytometry, 1991,12, 330–335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. FARSUND T., LAERUM O.D., HOSTMARK J., JORDFALD G. — Local chemotherapeutic effects in bladder cancer demonstrated by selective sampling and flow cytometry.J. Urol., 1984,131, 22–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. FOON K.A., TODD R.F. — Immunologic classification of leukemia and lymphoma.Blood, 1986,68, 1–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. GERLYNG P., STOKKE T., HUITFELDT H.S., STENERSEN T., DANIELSEN H.E., GROTMOL T., SEGLEN P. O. — Analytical methods for the study of liver cell proliferation.Cytometry, 1992,13, 404–415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. HULETTE B.C., BANAVALI S.D., FINKE D.P., GOPAL V., PREISLER H.D. — Protooncogene expression in subpopulations of cells from leukemia patients.Cytometry, 1992,13, 653–658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. IMAMURA N., KURAMATO A. — Detection of minimal residual disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by flow cytometry with monoclonal antibodies.Am. J. Hematol., 1991,38, 332–334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. ISOBE H., MIYAMOTO H., SHIMIZU T., HANEDA H., HASHIMOTO M., INOVE K., MIZUNO S., KAWAKAMI Y. — Prognostic and therapeutic significance of the flow cytometric nuclear DNA content in non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer, 1991,65, 1391–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. JARVIS L.R. — The microcomputer and image analysis in diagnostic pathology.Microsc. Res. Tech., 1992,21, 292–299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. KAERN J., WETTERLAND J., TROPÉ C.G., FARRANTS G.W., JUHNG S-W., PETTERSEN E.O., REITH A., DANIELSEN H.E. — Comparison between flow cytometry and image cytometry in ploidy distribution assessments in gynecologic cancer.Cytometry, 1992,13, 314–321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. KALLIONIENI O.P. — Comparison of fresh and paraffin-embedded tissue as starting material for DNA flow cytometry and evaluation of intratumor heterogeneity.Cytometry, 1988,9, 164–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. KAVATHAS P., HERZENBERG L.A. — Stable transformation of mouse L cells for human membrane T-cell differentiation antigens, HLA and beta2-microglobulin: Selection by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1983,80, 524–528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. KRONICK M.N. — The use of phycobiliproteins as fluorescent labels in immunoassay.J. Immunol. Meth., 1986,92, 1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. LACOMBE F., BELLOC F., DUMAIN P., PUNTOUS M., LOPEZ F., BERNARD P., BOISSEAU M.R., REIFFERS J. — Quantitation of resistance of leukemic cells to cytosine arabinoside from BrdUrd/DNA bivariate histograms.Cytometry, 1992,13, 730–738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. LEE S., MOYER G.H., KELLY S. — Challenging the future. Interactive static image analysis: a major enhancement to histopathology and cytology.Clin. Lab. Manage. Rev., 1991,2, 120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  23. LIN M.S., COMMINGS D.E., ALFI O.S. — Optical studies of the interaction of 4-5-diaminidino-2-phenylindole with DNA and metaphase chromosomes.Chromosoma, 1977,60, 15–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. LOKEN M.R., KEIJ J.F., KELLEY K.A. — Comparison of Helium-Neon and Dye Lasers for the Excitation of Allophycocyanin.Cytometry, 1987,8, 96–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. LOOK A.T., MELVIN S.L., WILLIAMS D.L., BRODEUR G.M., DAHL G.V., KALWINSKY D.K., MURPHY S.B., MAUER A.M. — Aneuploidy and percentage of S-phase cells determined by flow cytometry correlate with cell phenotype in childhood acute leukemia.Blood, 1982,60, 959–967.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. LOPEZ M., OLIVE D., MANNONI P. — Analysis of cytosolic ionized calcium variation in polymorphonuclear leukocytes using flow cytometry and Indo-1 AM.Cytometry, 1989,10, 165–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. MC KEEVER P.E. — Computerized image analysis of distinct cell marker parameters of glial fibrillary acidic protein: intensity of immunofluorescence and topography in human glioma cultures.Cellular and Molecular Biology, 1992,38, 175–180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. MÉTEZEAU P., RONOT X., LE NOAN-MERDRIGNAC G., RATINAUD M.H. (Eds). — La cytométrie en flux. Medsi/McGraw-Hill, Paris 3–11, 1988.

  29. MUSGROVE E., RUGG C., HEDLEY D. — Flow cytometric measurement of cytoplasmic pH: a critical evaluation of available fluorochromes.Cytometry, 1986,7, 347–355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. OUD P.S. PAHLPLATZ M., BECK J.L.M., WIERSMA VAN TILBURG A., WAGENAAR S.J., VOOIJS G.P. — Image and flow DNA cytometry of small cell carcinoma of the lung.Cancer, 1989,64, 1304–1309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. PARPALEIX T., BICHET N., LAINE H., DECHARIAUX H., ZACCAGNINO P., GOUT D. — Analyse automatique du test de réparation de l’ADN par traitement d’image. Forum Mutagenèse et Industrie, Paris, décembre 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  32. PARRY W.L., HEMSTRUT G.P. — Cancer detection by quantitative fluorescence image analysis.J. Urol., 1988,139, 270–274.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. SAGE B.H., O’CONNELL J.P., MERCOLINO T.J. — A rapid, vital staining procedure for flow cytometric analysis of human reticulocytes.Cytometry, 1983,4, 222–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. SCHMITZ A., CHAPUT B., FOUCHET P., GUILLY M. N., FRELAT G., VAIMAN M. — Swine chromosomal DNA Quantification by bivariate flow karyotyping and karyotype interpretation.Cytometry, 1992,13, 703–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. STEVENSON F.K., BELL A.J., CUSACK R., HAMBLIN T.J., SLADE C.J., SPELLERBERG M.B., STEVENSON G.T. — Preliminary studies for an immunotherapeutic approach to the treatment of human myeloma using chimeric anti-CD38 antibody.Blood, 1991,77, 1071–1079.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. TITUS J.A., HAUGLAND R., SHARROW S.O., SEGAL D.M. — Texas red, a hydrophilic, red-emitting fluorophore for use with fluorescein in dual parameter flow microfluorometric and fluorescence microscopic studies.J. Immunol Meth., 1982,50, 193–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. TOBEY R.A., OKA M.S., CRISSMAN H.A. — Analysis of effects of chemotherapeutic agents on cell growth kinetics in cultured cells. In: Melamed M.R., Mullaney P.F., Mendelsohn M.L. (Eds). Flow cytometry and sorting. John Wiley and sons. New York, 1979, 573–581.

    Google Scholar 

  38. TRASK B., VAN DEN ENGH G., NUSSBAUM R., SCHWARTZ C., GRAY J. — Quantification of the DNA content of structurally abnormal X chromosomes and X chromosome aneuploidy using high resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.Cytometry, 1990,111, 184–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. TSOU K., HONG D., VARELLO M. — Flow cytometric analysis as a diagnostic aid for cervical condyloma and cancer.Cancer, 1984,54, 1778–1787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. UCKUN F.M. — Regulation of human B-cell oncogeny.Blood, 1990,76, 1908–1923.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. UCKUN F.M., GAJL-PECZALSKA K., MYERS D.E., JASZCZ W., HAISSIG S., LEDBETTER J.A. — Temporal association of CD40 antigen expression with discrete stages of human B cell oncogeny and the efficacy of anti CD40 immunotoxins against clonogenic B lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia as well as B lineage Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma cells.Blood, 1990,76, 2449–2456.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. VAN DAM P.A., WATSON J.V., LOWE D.G., CHARD T., SHEPHERD J.H. — Comparative evaluation of fresh, fixed, and cryopreserved solid tumor cells for reliable flow cytometry of DNA and tumor associated antigen.Cytometry, 1992,13, 722–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. VAN ERP P.E.J., JANSEN M.J.J.M., DE JONGH G.J., BOEZEMAN J.B.M., SCHALKWIJK J. — Ratiometric measurement of intracellular pH in cultured human keratinocytes using carboxy-SNARF-1 and flow cytometry.Cytometry, 1991,12, 127–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. VANDENBERGHE P.A., CEUPPENS J.L. — Flow cytometric measurement of cytoplasmic free calcium in human peripheral blood T lymphocytes with fluo-3, a new fluorescent calcium indicator.J. Immunol. Meth., 1990,127, 197–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. WIED G.L., MOYER G.H., BIBBO M., DYTCH H.E., BARTELS P.H. — Image analysis in quantitative histopathology.Human Pathol., 1989,20, 549–571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. YEUTSCH C.M., HORAA P.K., MUIRHEAD K.A. — Flow cytometry and cell sorting: a technique for analysis and sorting of aquatic particles.Limnol. Oceanogr., 1974,28, 1275–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ch. Duperray

    Present address: Service Régional de Cytométrie en Flux, INSERM U291, 99, rue Puech Villa, 34197, Montpellier Cedex 5, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service Régional de Cytométrie en Flux, INSERM U291, 99, rue Puech Villa, 34197, Montpellier Cedex 5, France

    T. Parpaleix

  2. Service d’anatomo-pathologie, Hôpital La Peyronie, Montpellier, France

    Valérie Costes & P. Baldet

Authors
  1. Ch. Duperray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valérie Costes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Baldet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Parpaleix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Duperray, C., Costes, V., Baldet, P. et al. Cytométrie en flux et en image: principes et applications. Acta Endosc 23, 285–294 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02970002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02970002

Mots-clés

Key-words

Search

Navigation