Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Basic considerations for implementing instructional development programs in higher education: Some suggestions from the literature

  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abedor, A.J. & Gustafson, K.L. Evaluating instructional development programs: Two sets of criteria.Audiovisual Instruction, 1971,16 (10), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, L.T., & Yelon, S.L. (Eds.).Instructional development agencies in higher education. E. Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Learning Service, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J.V. Organizational innovation: Individual, structural, and environmental impacts. In J.V. Baldridge & T.E. Deal (Eds.),Managing change in educational organizations. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilby, A.E. Instructional development in the public schools—Whose job?Educational Technology, 1974,14 (1), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benne, K.D., & Birnbaum, M. Principles of changing. In W.G. Bennis, K.D. Benne, & R. Chin (Eds.),The planning of change. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickell, H.M. Two change strategies for local school systems. InRational planning in curriculum and instruction. Washington: National Education Association, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briley, T.S. The EDO and the able system for instructional improvement.Audiovisual Instruction, 1971,16 (10), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhl, L.C. A personal assessment of the state of instructional development.Educational Consulting Study Newsletter, 1975, January, 2–7.

  • Clark, D.L. & Guba, E.G.Effecting change in institutions of higher education. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration International Inter-Visitation Program, October, 1966.

  • Corprew, J.C. & Davis, H.J. An organizational development (od) effort to improve instruction at a university with suggestions for successful implementation.Educational Technology, 1975,15 (9), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBloois, M., & Alder, D. Stimulating faculty readiness for instructional development: A conservative approach to improving college teaching.Educational Technology, 1973,13 (7), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detweiler, M.J.“Instructional development” at Sangamon State University. Springfield, IL: Sangamon State University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R.M. Instructional development:. Fact or fiction?Audiovisual Instruction, 1971,16 (10), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R.M. Academic redesign in higher education—A matter of survival.Audiovisual Instruction, 1974,19 (10), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R.M., Eickmann, P.E., Kelly, E.F., Holloway, R.E., Vickery, T.R., & Pascarella, E.T.Instructional development for individualized learning in higher education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, J.E., & Johnson, F.C. A catalytic agent for innovation in higher education.Educational Record, 1967,48, 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, M., & Brogdan, R. Participant observation: A promising research approach for educational technology.Phi Delta Kappan, 1974,56 (1), 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durzo, J.J. Instructional development in the New Hampshire College and University Council: The creation of a setting (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1976).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977, 38 A. (University Microfilms No. 77-24, 365). (a)

  • Durzo, J.J. Literature of instructional development: A summary of implications for implementing instructional development programs.Faculty Development and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1976,2, 4–8. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, M.S. Mastering change in education, getting started: Assessing readiness for change.Educational Technology, 1976,16 (9), 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, D.J. A study to determine the status of instructional development programs within institutions of higher education (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1969).Dissertation Abstracts International 1970,30, 3185-A. (University Microfilms No. 70-1913).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. Promoting innovation in teaching and learning: Problems, processes and institutional mechanisms.Higher Education, 1975,4 (1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurich, A.E. The commitment to experiment and innovate in college teaching.Educational Record, 1964,45 (1), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, G. Faculty development—The key to instructional development. InDevelopment—Significant tresponse to education’s problems. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, School of Education, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. Overview of the innovative process and the user.Interchange, 1972,3 (2–3), 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J.G. New approaches to improve teaching, in D.W. Vermilye (Ed.),Learner-centered reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J.G.Toward faculty renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, V.S., & Ely, D.P.Teaching and media: A systematic approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P.W., Mann, D., & McLaughlin, M.W.Federal programs supporting educational change, volume III: The process of change, R-1589/3-HEW. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, N., Giacquinta, J.B., & Bernstein, M.Implementing organizational innovations. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group for Human Development in Higher Education.Faculty development in a time of retrenchment. New Rochelle, NY:Change Magazine, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, K.L. Toward a definition of instructional development: A systems view. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Division of Instructional Development of the Association for Educational Communications & Technology, Philadelphia, March, 1971.

  • Gustafson, K.L. Improving instructional development: Faculty as learners.Educational Technology, 1975,15 (5), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammons, J.O. How effective are shortterm faculty workshops?Audiovisual Instruction, 1975,20 (10), 26–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamreus, D.G. Toward a definition of instructional development: An organizational approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Division of Instructional Development of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Philadelphia, March, 1971.

  • Haney, J.B., Lange, P.C. & Barson, J. The heuristic dimension of instructional development.A V Communication Review, 1968,16, 358–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, J.A. Developing a tradition of innovation. Paper presented at the National Conference on Curricular & Instructional Innovation for Large Colleges & Universities, E. Lansing, MI, November 6, 1966.

  • Havelock, R.G.The change agent’s guide to innovation in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathers, G. Planned educational change in search of a research tradition. In A.R. Jwaideh, & H.S. Bhola (Eds.),Research in diffusion of educational innovations: A report with an agenda. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, School of Education, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, D.J. Faculty development—A needed perspective in ID.Audiovisual Instruction, 1974,19(10), 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsclaw, J.E. The development of procedural guidelines for the systematic design of instruction within higher education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1974).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1974,35, 1873-A. (University Microfilms No. 74-21, 479).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, J.A. Appendix C: Obstacles to curricular and teaching-learning innovation in higher education. In H.R. Bowen, & K.G. Douglass,Efficiency in liberal education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.M. An administrator’s guide to instructional development.Audiovisual Instruction, 1971,16 (10), 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, J. Political linkage, the academic innovation process.Journal of Higher Education, 1974,45, 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippit, G.L.Visualizing change: Model building and the change process. Fairfax, VA: NTL Learning Resources Corporation, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, F.W., & Ramsey, M.A. The use of anthropological field methods in education.Educational Researcher, 1974,3 (10), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J.H. The impact of instructional improvement agencies in higher education.Journal of Higher Education, 1975,46, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, R.H. & Weidner, E.W. Creating and encouraging an innovative academic environment in higher education.Higher Education, 1975,4 (1), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, L.B.How colleges change: Approaches to academic reform. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, School of Education, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources, 1976, ED#125-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, L.B. & Ford, P.J.Changing the curriculum. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. Innovations in education: Some generalizations. In M.B. Miles (Ed.),Innovation in education. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, W.R., Jr., & Moonmaw, W.E. Organizing innovation: Five stages. In J. Duley (Ed.),Implementing field experience education, new directions for higher education, number 6. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, J. Incentives for innovation in the public schools.Review of Educational Research, 1974,44, 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W.J. Higher education’s commitment to instructional improvement programs.Educational Researcher, 1974,3, (11), 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J.L., & Wildavsky, A.Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. The communication of innovations: Strategies for change in complex institutions. Paper presented at the National Conference on Curricular and Instructional Innovation for Large Colleges and Universities, E. Lansing, MI, November 6–11, 1966.

  • Rogers, E.M. The communication of innovations in a complex institution.Educational Record, 1968,49 (1), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M., & Shoemaker, F.F.Communication of innovations, a cross cultural Approach. New York: Free Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roueche, J.E., & Boggs, J.R.The educational development officer—A change catalyst for two-year colleges. Durham, NC: Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas, 1970, ED #043-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer, C. A vide-president looks at instructional development.Audiovisual Instruction, 1971,16, (10), 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, D.R. Incentives in instructional development.Educational Technology, 1977,17 (8), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmer, E.J. & Stakenas, R.G.Instructional development handbook. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University, Division of Instructional Research & Service, Instructional Development Center, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. Resistance to change, In G. Watson (Ed.),Concepts for social change, Washington: National Education Association, National Training Laboratories, Cooperative Program for Educational Development, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, R.P., & Brammer, L.M. The ills of college teaching: Diagnosis and prescription.Journal of Higher Education, 1973,44 (1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittich, W.A., & Schuller, C.F.Instructional technology: Its nature and use. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbeck, J.Innovations and organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., Florio, D., & Sikorski, L.Dynamic educational change. New York: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TRATEC, Incorporated, 2040 Avenue of the Stars, 90067, Los Angeles, California

    Joseph J. Durzo

Authors
  1. Joseph J. Durzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durzo, J.J. Basic considerations for implementing instructional development programs in higher education: Some suggestions from the literature. Journal of Instructional Development 1, 30–35 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02968233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02968233

Keywords

Search

Navigation