Skip to main content
Log in

Religion, standard of living and the quality of life

  • Published:
Contemporary Jewry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to analyze the impact of religiosity on the standard of living and the quality of life of Jews in Israel as well as on the efficiency with which they are able to transform resources (their standard of living) into quality of life. The data sources are a time-budget survey conducted around 1992 in Israel. The methodology is based on the use of the concept of distance function that has appeared in the literature on duality in production and consumption and has been widely applied in efficiency analysis. The statistical procedure is based on both the so-ealled corrected ordinary least squares method (COLS) and on the stochastic production frontier analysis (FRONTIER).

The results of this empirical investigation indicate that whereas the gender has no effect on the standard of living or the quality of life, the standard of living increases with education and age, is higher among individuals who are single and lower among the most recent immigrants (those who came after 1971 from Europe or America) as well as among the very religious (theharedi). The quality of life is found to be higher among single, more educated individuals and lower among the most recent immigrants. But it is also higher among religious (those who define themselves as being religious or very religious) than among the non religious people. It appears therefore that the very religious (the “haredim”) are more efficient in transforming resources (their standard of living) into quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D., C. A. K. Lovell and P. Schmidt. (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models”Journal of Econometrics. 6: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E. and G. S. Corra. (1977). “Estimation of a Production Frontier Model:With Application to the Pastoral Zones of Eastem Australia,”Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 21: 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976).The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago, L: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics. (1995).Time Use in Israel, Time Budget Survey. 1991/1992. Publication 996, Jerusalem, Israel.

  • Coelli, T. J. (1992). “A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation:Version Frontier 2.0,”Economics Letters. 39: 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T., D.S. Prasada Rao and G. E. Battese. (1998).An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1979). “The Distance Function in Consumer Behavior with Application to Index Numbers and Optimal Taxation,”Review of Economic Studies. 46: 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. and J. Muellbauer. (1980).Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhausse, B. (1996). “An Attempt at Measuring Functioning and Capabilities,”Mimeo. University of Liege.

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, CXX:253–290.

  • Green, W. H. (1992).LIMDEP Version 6.0:User’s Manual and Reference Guide. New York: Econometric Software Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • lannaccone, L. R. (1998). “An Introduction to the Economics of Religion,”Journal of Economic Literature. XXXVI: 1465–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966). “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,”Journal of Political Economy. 74: 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K., S. Richardson, P. Travers and L. Wood. (1994). “Resources and Functionings:A New View of Inequality in Australia,” inModels and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality, edited by W. Eichhom. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck. (1977). “Efficiency Estimates from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error,”International Economic Review. 18: 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muellbauer, J. (1987). “Professor Sen on the Standard of Living,” in A. Sen,The Standard of Living. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973). “Behavior and the Concept of Preference,”Economica. 40: 241–259. Reprinted in A. Sen,Choice, Welfare and Measurement. (1982).Cambridge, MA:Blackwell, Oxford and M.I.T. Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1976), “Real National Income,”Review of Economic Studies 43: 19–39, Reprinted in A, Sen,Choice. Welfare and Measurement. (1982) Cambridge, MA:Blackwell, Oxford and M.I.T. Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1985).Commodities and Capabilities. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1987).The Standard of Living Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. (1982). “A Stationary Point for the Stochastic Frontier Likelihood,”Journal of Econometrics. 18: 275–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deutsch, J., Silber, J. Religion, standard of living and the quality of life. Cont Jewry 20, 119–137 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967962

Keywords

Navigation