Dysmenorrhœa: The oldest theories and the newest treatment
- 12 Downloads
The special purpose of my paper is to remove the weeds which arrest the growth and development of the modern theories of dysmenorrhœa which I outlined in a previous communication. Some of these weeds are most difficult to eradicate; for they have their roots deep down in the history of gynæcology. I refer in particular to Menge’s version of the psychological theory of pain which he based upon a false philosophy and a false physiology.
I admit that a genuine psychological theory of dysmenorrhœa based upon Aristotle’s theory of body-mind relationship is a theoretical possibility. We shall have to depend, however, upon the results of psychotherapy in order to refute the hypothesis or convert it into an accepted theory. I also admit that psychological factors may augment the intensity of dysmenorrhœic pain. Psychotherapy, therefore, may be a useful adjunct to the treatment of dysmenorrhœic cases whether they rest upon a physiological or psychological basis.
Mechanical theories of dysmenorrhœa arise from a natural prejudice on the part of certain gynæcologists against psychological explanations; for between such explanations of functional dysmenorrhœa and mechanical explanations, there can be no via media from the point of view of psycho-physical parallelism.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Waterston:Brit. Med. Jo., 1934, ii, 1037.Google Scholar
- 3.Blair Bell:Jo. Obst. Gyn. B.E., 1923, xxxviii, 2.Google Scholar
- 4.Fairbairn:Ibid. Google Scholar
- 5.Graves :Textbook of Gynecology. 3rd Ed. Saunders. 1923. P. 550.Google Scholar
- 6.Novak and Harnik:Med. Klin., 1929, xxv, 251.Google Scholar
- 7.Eden andLockyer.Textbook of Gynecology. 4th Ed. Appleton. 1935.Google Scholar
- 10.Cotte:Troubles fonctionelles de l’Appareil genital de la, Femme. Masson, Paris. 1931.Google Scholar