Abstract
Background
It is important for breast reconstruction after mastectomy to recreate immediately good breast symmetry with an adequate amount of soft tissue.
Methods
Eight patients with breast cancer underwent skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. This operative technique, and the results, advantages, and disadvantages of the technique were assessed.
Results
Seven patients had stage IIA disease, and one patient had stage I disease. An arc-shaped incision was made just at the lateral border of the breast in all patients. Three patients had a separate periareolar incision, and one had a cicumferential nipple incision. There was 100% flap survival, and good breast symmetry was achieved in all patients. No major perioperative complications occurred in this series. A small amount of fat necrosis occurred in one flap. One patient had slight abdominal bulging. Minor wound-healing problems at the lateral breast skin envelope occurred in two patients.
Conclusion
These data indicate that skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a DIEP flap is a reliable and safe technique. This method is a potentially useful surgical technique, which has achieved very promising results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Toth BA, Lappert P: Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning.Plast Reconstr Surg 87: 1048–1053, 1991.
Dinner MI, Sampliner J, Artz JS, Foglietti MA: Optimal cosmetic autogenous reconstruction with modified radical mastectomy.Surg Gynecol Obstet 176: 82–85, 1993.
Leboic GS, Laub DR, Berkowitz RL: Aesthetic approach to simple and modified radical mastectomy.Contemp Surg 45: 15–19, 1994.
Grant WC, Bostwick J, Styblo TM, Moore B, Bried JT, Murray DR, Wood WC: Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations.Ann Surg 225: 570–578, 1997.
Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, Houlihan MJ, Koufman CN, Morris DJ, Troyan SL, Goldwyn RM: Skinsparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: Oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer.Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 49–61, 1998.
Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Boyd JB: The versatile deep inferior epigastric (inferior rectus abdominis) flap.Br J Plast Surg 37: 330–350, 1984.
Koshima I, Soeda S: Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle.Br J Plast Surg 42: 645–648, 1989.
Allen RJ, Treece FT: Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg 32: 32–38, 1994.
Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff EM, Webster HC: Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: Experience with the first 50 flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg 103: 86–95, 1999.
Blondeel PN: One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience.Br J Plast Surg 52: 104–111, 1999.
Keller A: The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg 46: 474–480, 2001.
Blondeel PN, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Lysens R, Boeckx WD, Matton G: The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.Br J Plast Surg 50: 322–330, 1997.
Arnez ZM, Khan U, Pogorelec D, Planinsek F: Rational selection of flaps from the abdomen in breast reconstruction to reduce donor site morbidity.Br J Plast Surg 52: 351–354, 1999.
Kroll SS: Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myaocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg 106: 576–583, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Reprint requests to Kenji Yano, Department of Plastic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02967663.
About this article
Cite this article
Yano, K., Hosokawa, K., Nakai, K. et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Breast Cancer 10, 275–280 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966729
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966729