Skip to main content
Log in

The 27-day variation in cosmic ray intensity

  • Solar and Geomagnetic Effects on Cosmic Rays
  • Section C: Cosmic Ray variation
  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

Conclusions

The following facts emerge from the study:

  1. 1)

    In general there is a negative correlation betweenI, the cosmic ray intensity, andK bp the planetary index, although there are exceptions.

  2. 2)

    There is a positive correlation between the relative decrease in intensity, —I/It and the planetary index,K bp. There are exceptions during the low sunspot activity period of 1949 ÷ 54.

  3. 3)

    TheK bp minimum (or maximum) is observed to precede the corresponding cosmic ray one in some years and follow in other years. But it appears that the latter case is generally found during the rising part of the solar cycle and possibly during the early fall.

  4. 4)

    There is clear evidence that the amplitude of the 27 day variation in cosmic ray intensity follows the geomagnetic disturbance better than the solar activity. Both of them exhibit similar departure from solar activity during 1946 ÷ 52.

  5. 5)

    The time of maximum of the diurnal variation of cosmic ray intensity on disturbed days follows the geomagnetic disturbance better than the solar activity. The semidiurnal time of maximum on disturbed days appears to follow the solar activity in a rough measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Forbush:Phys. Rev.,52, 1254 (1937).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. V. F. Hess andA. Demmelmair:Nature,140, 316 (1937).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. R. Hogg:Memoirs of the Commonwealth Observatory, Canberra, No. 10 (1949).

  4. Y. Sekido, M. Wada, I. Kondò andK. Kawabata:Rep. Ion. Res. Japan,9, 174 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Yoshida:Nuovo Cimento,4, 1410 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. A. Simpson:Phys. Rev.,94, 426 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. L. Chasson:Phys. Rev.,96, 1117.

  8. D. W. N. Dolbear andH. Elliot:Nature,159, 58 (1947).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Trumpy:Physica,19, 645 (1953).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. P. Kane:Phys. Rev.,98, 130 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Heerdan andThambyah Pillai:Phil. Mag.,46, 1238 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Venkatesan:International Astronomical Union Conference on Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics (1956).

  13. Carnegie Institution Publication:Cosmic Ray Results from Huancayo Observatory, Publication 175 (1948).

  14. H. Alfvén:Cosmical Electrodynamics (Oxford, 1950), Chap. VI;

  15. H. Alfvén:Tellus,6, 232 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Alfvén:Tellus,7, 50 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Alfvén:International Astronomical Union Conference on Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics (1956).

  18. D. Venkatesan:Tellus, Awaiting publication (1957).

  19. P. Meyer andJ. A. Simpson:Phys. Rev.,96, 1085 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. V. Sarabhai, U. D. Desai andD. Venkatesan:Phys. Rev.,96, 469 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venkatesan, D. The 27-day variation in cosmic ray intensity. Nuovo Cim 8 (Suppl 2), 285–297 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02962537

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02962537

Navigation