Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 150–163 | Cite as

Acceptability of online degrees as criteria for admission to graduate programs

  • Margaret H. DeFleur
  • Jonathan Adams
Article

Abstract

THIS PAPER PRESENTS the results of a nationwide survey of deans, associate deans, and directors who make recommendations concerning the admission of applicants to graduate programs in their colleges and universities. A questionnaire was sent to a sample of academic officers in public and private institutions describing three different types of applicants. Each of the three applicants had a bachelor’s degree in the relevant subject, good grades, similar GRE scores, and strong letters of recommendation. However, one applicant had studied in the traditional classroom and laboratory settings on campus. A second applicant had taken half of the required courses for the bachelor’s degree online and half on campus. The third applicant had taken all courses for the degree over the Internet. The question addressed by the project is whether a bachelor’s degree earned partially or fully online is equally acceptable to those who recommend students for graduate admissions. The findings indicate clearly that they are not.

Keywords

online degrees distance education acceptability kcriteria for graduate admissions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. (2003, in press). Understanding faculty advancement and technology: An academic accomplishment index. Accepted for publication inJournalism and Mass Communication Educator.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2003). Sizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003.The Sloan Consortium, Needham, MA, Retrieved November 24, 2003, from http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/ sizing_opportunity.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Altschuler, G. (2001, August 5). The e-learning curve.The New York Times, p. 13.Google Scholar
  4. Carnevale, D. (2002a, October 18). Online colleges complain about traditional institutions’ tough credit-transfer policies.The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A35.Google Scholar
  5. Carnevale, D. (2002b, November 8). Distance education attracts older women who have families and jobs, study finds.The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A33.Google Scholar
  6. Carnevale, D., & Olsen, F. (2003, June 13). How to succeed in distance education.The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A31.Google Scholar
  7. Kiernan, V. (2003, August 8). A survey documents growth in distance education in late 1990s.The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A28.Google Scholar
  8. Levine, A., & Sun, J. (2002). Barriers to distance education.American Council on Education, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Maki, W., & Maki, R. (2002). Multimedia comprehension skill predicts differential outcomes of web-based and lecture courses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8(2), 85–98.Google Scholar
  10. McNamar, Q. (1949).Psychological statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Peabody, Z. (2001, September 27). College education online: Pass? Fail?Los Angeles Times Retrieved November 25, 2003, from http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-000077248sep27.story.Google Scholar
  12. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education.The Institute for Higher Education Policy, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, T. (2000).The no significant difference phenomenon. Retrieved November 25, 2003, from http://teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificantdifference/.Google Scholar
  14. Symonds, W. (2001, December 3). Giving it the old online try.Business Week, p. 76.Google Scholar
  15. Terry, R. (2002, September 2). Back to school: After failing their first online test, colleges and education companies are learning from their mistakes.Washington Techway, p. 29.Google Scholar
  16. Twigg, C.A. (2003, September/October). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning.EDUCAUSE Review, pp. 28, 30, 32–36, 38.Google Scholar
  17. Waits, T., & Lewis, L. (2003). Distance education at degree-granting post-secondary institutions 2000–2001.U.S. Department of Education Center for Educational Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Young, J. (2000, February 18). Distance and classroom education seen as equally effective.The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret H. DeFleur
    • 1
  • Jonathan Adams
    • 2
  1. 1.College of CommunicationBoston UniversityUSA
  2. 2.College of CommunicationFlorida State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations