Abstract
This paper presents the effect of external corrosion, material properties, operation condition and design thickness in pipeline on failure prediction using a failure probability model. The predicted failure assessment for the simulated corrosion defects discovered in corroded pipeline is compared with that determined by ANSI/ASME B31G code and a modified B31G method. The effects of environmental, operational, and random design variables such as defect depth, pipe diameter, defect length, fluid pressure, corrosion rate, material yield stress and pipe thickness on the failure probability are systematically studied using a failure probability model for the corrosion pipeline.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahammed. M.. 1998, “Probabilistic Estimation of Remaining Life of a Pipeline in the Presence of Active Corrosion Defects,”International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 75, pp. 321–329.
Ahammed, M. and Melchers, R. E., 1996, “Reliability Estimation of Pressurised Pipelines Subject to Localized Corrosion Defects,”Int. J. Pres. Ves and Piping, 69, pp. 267–272.
Ahammed, M. and Melchers, R. E., 1997, “Probabilistic Analysis of Underground Pipelines Subject to Combined Stresses and Corrosion,”Engineering Structures, Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 988–994.
ANSI/ASME B31-I985, 1985, “Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipeline,”Supplement to ANSI/ASME B3IG Code for Pressure Piping. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Bubenik, T. A., Olson, R. J., Stephens, D. R. and Francini, R. B, 1992, “Analyzing the Pressure Strength of Corroded Linepipe,”Proc, 11th Int, Conf. Offshore Mech and Arctic Eng., Vol V, pp. 225–232.
Choi, S. C., 2000, “Coating Flaw Prevention of Underground Buried Pipeline,”Gas Safety Journal. Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 25–33.
Hopkins P. and Jones D. G., 1992, “A study of the Behaviourof Long and Complexshaped Corrosion in Transmission Pipelines.“In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Volume V, Part A, pp. 211–217.
Kiefner, J. F., 1974, “Corroded Pipe Strength and Repair Methods,”Symposium on Line Pipe Research, Houston, Texas.
Kiefner, J. F., Hisey, D. T. and O’Grady, T. J., 1992, “Pressure Calculation for Corroded Pipe Developed,”Oil and Gas Journal, pp. 84–89.
Kim. S. H, Kim, J. W. and Kim, K.J., 1997, “Three-Dimensional Dynamic Analysis of Underground Openings Subjected to Explosive Loadings,”Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 171–178.
Lee, O. S. and Kim, H. J., 1998, “Criterion for Predicting Failure External Corroded Pipeline.”Proceeding of Korea Institute of Industrial Safety, pp. 261–266.
Lee, O.S. and Kim, H. J., 1999, “Effect of External Corrosion in Pipeline on Failure Prediction,”Proceeding of Korean Society of Mechan- ical Engineering, Vol. 23. No. 11, pp. 2096–2101.
Lee, O. S. and Choi, S. S., 1999, “Effect of Circular Cavity on Maximum Equivalent Stress and Stress Intensity Factor at a Crack in Buried Pipeline,”KSME International Journal, Vol. 13. No. 4, pp. 350–357.
Lee, O. S. and Cho J. U., 1992, “Computer Simulation of the Dynamic Behavior of Three Point Bend Specimen,”KSME International Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 58–62.
Mohammdi, J., Saxena, S. K. and Wong, Y. T., 1985, “Modeling Failure Probability Underground Pipes,”Underground Pipeline Engineering, pp. 193–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, O.S., Pyun, J.S. Failure probability of corrosion pipeline with varying boundary condition. KSME International Journal 16, 889–895 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02949716
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02949716