Abstract
The present study investigates the feasibility of a composite panel: a series of individually evacuated panels incapsulated in a rigid closed cell foam matrix. The panels were encapsulated in a thin glass sheet barrier to preserve the vacuum. Glass has been chosen as the barrier material because it has a relatively low thermal conductivity and it is effectively impermeable to all gases. Low cost perlite powder has also been used, because its thermal conductivity is very similar to the thermal conductivity of other finer and more expensive powders, such as silica provided that low pressures are maintained within the panel by using a glass gas permeation barrier. The individual plastic-enclosed evacuated powder panels encapsulated in a thin glass barrier, have been put together in a matrix structure so that even if one individual panel is punctured or damaged, the insulating performance of the entire matrix is not significantly affected. Individual powder panels were produced and tested in this study. The thermal conductivity of the individual panel was found to be 0.0062 W/m·K. The composite foam block with embedded vacuum panels achieved an overall thermal conductivity of 0.01656 W/m·K for a 4.2 cm thick composite block. The polyurethane foam used above foam block had a thermal conductivity of 0.024 W/m·K. Numerical analysis has indicated that by using low conductivity foam and more optimal vacuum panel geometries, much lower overall conductivities can be achieved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burke, M., 1990, “Insulation Based on Silica Powder Vacuum-Packed in Thin Glass,” M. S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Glicksman, L. R. and Ostrogorsky, A. G., 1989, “Time Variation of Insulating Properties of Closed-Cell Foam Insulation,”Journal of Thermal Insulation, Vol. 12, pp. 270–283.
Glicksman, L. R., Brehm, T. R. and Ostrogorsky, A. G., 1989, “Thermal Insulation: Degradation of Foam Insulation with Time and the Impact of Environmental Regulations on Foam Properties,”Proceedings of the CIB XIth International Congress, Paris, France.
Glicksman, L. R. and Page, M. C., 1989, “Effects of Alternate Blowing Agents on the Aging of Closed-Cell Foam Insulation,”Proceedings of the International Thermal Conductivity Conference, Lexington, KY.
Glicksman, L. R., 1991, “Two-Dimensional Heat Transfer Effects on Vacuum and Reflective Insulation,”Journal of Thermal Insulation, 14, pp. 281–294, April.
Mcelroy, D. L., Yarbrough, D. W., Copeland, G. L., Weaver, F. J., Graves, R. S., Tong, T. W. and Fine, H. A., 1984, “Development of Advanced Thermal Insulation for Appliances,”Technical Report ORNL/CON-159, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Noborou, K., 1986,Finite Elements Method in Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York.
Solomou, N., 1993, “Development of Advanced Insulation Systems: Evacuated Powder Panels Encapsulated in a Thin Glass Barrier,” M. S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Tecplots User’s Manual, Version 6.9, Amte Engineering, Inc., P.O. Box 3633, Bellevue WA 98009-3633.
Zammit, M., 1992, “Development of Powder Evacuated Panel Insulation which is Encapsulated in a Thin Glass Barrier,” M. S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glicksman, L.R., Solomou, N. & Hong, J.K. A study on rigid foam/evacuated powder composite panels for thermal insulation. KSME International Journal 11, 229–237 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944896
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944896