Skip to main content
Log in

Changing trends in acute peptic ulcer surgery in a district surgical unit

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite changes in management and the advances in therapeutics, surgeons are still required to treat the complications of peptic ulceration. A retrospective review of all open surgical interventions for complications of peptic ulcer disease between January 1983 and December 1993 was carried out. There were no exclusion criteria.

Open gastric surgery accounted for 3% of all inpatient surgical procedures and 13% of all the major operations. There were 341 adult and 132 paediatric procedures performed in the 11 year period. Acute gastric procedures accounted for 34% of major gastric surgery in this district unit. 76 perforated ulcers and 39 bleeding ulcers required surgery. 38% of the patients were over 70 years.

The perioperative mortality was 13.9% (4% for those under 70 years). The overall morbidity rate was 71% and procedure-related morbidity rate was 17%. Acute gastric surgery has a very high inpatient morbidity and is associated with a significant mortality particularly in elderly patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fineberg, H. V., Pearlman, L. A. Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer United States. Lancet 1981; i: 1305–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen, A., Bousfield, R., Christiansen, J. Incidence of perforated and bleeding peptic ulcers before and after the introduction of H2-receptor antagonists. Ann Surg. 1988; 207: 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holman, R. A. E., David, M., Gough, K. R., Gartell, P., Britton, D. C., Smith, R. B. Value of a centralised approach in the management of haematemesis and melaena: experience in a district general hospital. Gut 1990; 31: 504–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wheatley, K. E., Snyman, J. H., Brearly, S., Keighley, M. R. B., Dykes, P. W. Mortality in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer when those aged 60 or over are operated on early. Br. Med. J. 1990; 301: 272.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Poxon, V. A., Keighley, M. R. B., Dykes, P. W., Heppinstall, K., Jaderberg, M. Comparison of minimal and conventional surgery in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer: a multicentre trial. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78: 344–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walt, R., Katschinski, B., Logan, R., Ashley, J., Langman, M. Rising frequency of ulcer perforation in elderly people in the United Kingdom. Lancet 1986; i: 489–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jordan, P. H., Morrow, C. Perforated peptic ulcer. Surg. Clin. Nth. Am. 1988; 68: 315–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matthewson, K., Pugh, S., Northfield, T. C. Which peptic ulcer patients bleed? Gut 1988; 29: 70–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleischer, D. Etiology and prevalence of severe persistent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 1983; 84: 538–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, P. N., Murray, W. R., Shaw, R., Brar, S. Surgical management of bleeding gastric ulceration. Br. J. Surg. 1988; 75: 16–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt, P. S., Hansky, J., Korman, M. G. Mortality in patients with haematemesis and melaena: a prospective study. Br. Med. J. 1979; 1 1238–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, K. G. M., Steele, R. J. C., Mollison, J., Crofts, T. J. Prediction of recurrent bleeding after endoscopic haemostasis in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Br. J. Surg. 1994; 81: 1465–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tekant, Y., Goh, P., Alexander, D. J., Isaac, J. R., Kum, C. K., Ngoi, S. S. Combination therapy using adrenaline and heater probe to reduce rebleeding in patients with peptic ulcer haemorrhage: a prospective randomized trial. Br. J. Surg. 1995; 82: 223–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Watkins, R. M., Dennison, A. R., Collin, J. What has happened to perforated peptic ulcer? Br. J. Surg. 1984; 71: 774–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jorgensen, T. G. Drug consumption before perforation of peptic ulcer. Br. J. Surg. 1977; 64: 247–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bornman, P. C., Theodorou, N. A., Jeffery, P. C., Marks, I. N., Essel, H. P., Wright, J. P., Terblanche, J. Simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer: a prospective evaluation of a conservative management policy. Br. J. Surg. 1990; 77: 73–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Raimes, S. A., Devlin, H. B. Perforated duodenal ulcer. Br. J. Surg. 1987; 74: 81–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boey, J., Lee, N. W., Koo, J., Lam, P. H. M., Wong, J., Ong, G. B. Immediate definitive surgery for perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1982; 196: 338–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sebastian, M. Prem Chandran, V. P. Elashaal, Y. I. M. Sim, A. J. W.Helicobacter pylori infection in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Br. J. Surg. 1995; 82: 360–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry, M.C., Gul, Y., Davies, M.G. et al. Changing trends in acute peptic ulcer surgery in a district surgical unit. I.J.M.S. 165, 109–112 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943795

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943795

Keywords

Navigation