Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding behaviour for juice quality through selfing and progeny evaluation in hybrid clones and inbred derivatives of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selfs of commercial clones, interspecific hybrids and their selfs, numbering 27, were evaluated for juice quality based on H.R.Brix in the first clonal trial. Commercial hybrids and their selfs produced a higher proportion of high quality progenies compared to interspecific hybrids and their selfs in line with the parental behaviour. Parent-progeny regression analysis explained 67 % of the variation by linearity indicating a high level of heritability of the trait. In general, a wide range of Brix was observed among the selfs, except in those of the top three parental clones for juice quality, which also did not produce any inferior progenies, indicating their high levels of homogeneity and concentration of sucrose genes in them. Inbreds of Co 1148 were more variable even after four generations of selfing in contrast to the third generation inbreds of Co 775. The efficiency of selfing in assessing the parental potential in sugarcane was revealed from this study, that, good parental clones for quality would be those with high juice quality that would yield selfs with high mean values, low SD and narrow range as observed in the case of CoC 671, Co 93020, 775-2-16 and 7201-157. Utilization of such clones in breeding would benefit quality improvement programme in sugarcane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Daniels, J. (1959). The inbreeding and close breeding of sugarcane. Proc. Intern. Soc. Sugar Cane Tech.

  • Heinz, D.J. and Tew, T.L. (1987). Hybridization procedures. In: Heinz, D.J. (ed). Sugarcane Improvement Through Breeding. Elsevier. Amsterdam, pp 313–341.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hemaprabha, G., Natarajan, U.S. and Balasundaram, N. (2000). Quantification of genetic similarity among inbred progenies of sugarcane based on isozyme markers. Sugar Cane International. September, 16–18.

  • Hogarth, D.M., Wu, K.K. and Heinz, D.J. (1987). Genetics of sugarcane. In: Heinz, D.J. (ed.) Sugarcane Improvement through breeding. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 255–271.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1954). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, B.T. and Daniels, J. (1987). A review of the origin and improvement of sugarcane. In: Copersucar Intern Sugar Cane Breeding workshop, Brazil, pp 1–31.

  • Stevenson, G.C. (1965). Genetics and the Breeding of sugarcane. Longmans, Green, London pp 213–245.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Hemaprabha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hemaprabha, G., Natarajan, U.S. & Balasundaram, N. Breeding behaviour for juice quality through selfing and progeny evaluation in hybrid clones and inbred derivatives of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Sugar Tech 5, 177–180 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943631

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943631

Keywords

Navigation