Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling: A randomised controlled trial

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pneumatic retinopexy (PR) is a technique for repairing certain retinal detachments which is easier to perform than conventional sceral buckling (SB) surgery but has comparable results. We performed a prospective, randomised, controlled trial to determine for ourselves whether PR is a safe and acceptable procedure.

Twenty patients presenting consecutively with retinal detachments which fulfilled the selection criteria were randomised to have their detachments repaired by either PR or SB, ten patients in each group. The suitable patients had a single retinal break or small group of breaks of not greater than one clock hour in size, situated within the superior eight clock hours of retina. Patients with significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy or other fundus disorders were excluded. All patients in the PR group had local anaesthesia while all those in the SB group had general anaesthesia. Successful reattachment of the retina was achieved with one or more procedures in 90 percent of the PR group and in 100 percent of the SB group. We feel that narrowing the selection criteria for PR may further improve the success rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosengren, B. Cases of retinal detachment treated with diathermy and injection of air into the vitreous body. Acta Ophthalmol. 1938; 15: 573–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hilton, G. F. et al. Pneumatic retinopexy: a collaborative report of the first 100 cases. Ophthalmol. 1987; 94: 307–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tornambe, P. E. et al. Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. The Retinal Detachment Study Group. Ophthalmol. 1989; 96(6): 772–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tornambe, P. E. et al. Pneumatic retinopexy. A two-year follow-up study of the multicenter clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. Ophthalmol. 1991; 98(7): 1115–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koch, F. et al. Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle. Preferences of Vitreous Society members, 1990. Retina 1992; 12(1): 43–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boker. T., Schmitt, C., Mougharbel, M. Results and prognostic factors in pneumatic retinopexy. Ger. J. Ophthalmol. 1994; 3(2): 73–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trillo, M. et al. Treatment of uncomplicated cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with an expanding gas bubble. Ophthalmologica. 1993; 207(3): 140–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Freyler, H., Radax, U. Pneumatic retinopexy — a study of 7 years experience (German). Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 1993; 202(3): 212–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe, M. et al. Pneumatic retinopexy. Surgical results. Arch Ophthal. 1988; 106(12): 1672–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Skoog, K., Textorius, O., Wrigstad, A. Pneumatic retinopexy in 50 patients. Acta Ophthalmologica 1989; 67(1): 130–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McAllister, I. et al. Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy with alternative surgical techniques. Ophthalmol. 1988; 95(7): 877–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ambler, J., Meyers, S., Zegarra, H., Paranandi, L. Reoperations and visual results after failed Pneumatic Retinoopexy. Ophthalmol. 1990; 97(6): 786–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong, D., Chignell, A., Ingelsby, D., Little, B., Franks, W. The treatment of bullous rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmol. 1992; 230(3): 218–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hilton, G., Grizzard, W. Pneumatic Retinopexy. A two-step outpatient operation without conjunctival incision. Ophthalmol. 1986; 93(5): 626–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hilton, G. et al. Pneumatic Retinopexy. An analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Retina 1991, 11(3): 285–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Algvere, P., Hallnas, K., Palmqvist, B. Success and complications of Pneumatic Retinopexy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1988; 106(4): 400–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7

    A. Mulvihill, T. Fulcher, V. Datta & R. Acheson

Authors
  1. A. Mulvihill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Fulcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Acheson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulvihill, A., Fulcher, T., Datta, V. et al. Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling: A randomised controlled trial. I J M S 165, 274–277 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943089

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943089

Keywords

Search

Navigation