Skip to main content
Log in

Transabdominal ultrasound and its correlation with clinical findings in gynaecology

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Details of 86 patients with a pelvic mass who underwent a laparotomy under the gynaecological service in St. Vincent’s Hospital were reviewed. Findings at laparotomy were correlated with ultrasound findings. Overall, ultrasound appears to be more sensitive and specific in the determination of the origins of a pelvic mass compared to clinical examination. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting a uterine mass is 94 per cent and 99 per cent respectively. This contrasts sharply with clinical examination (sensitivity = 74 per cent; specificity = 94 per cent). The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting an ovarian mass is 92 per cent and 71 per cent. Ultrasound is capable of predicting benign disease with reasonable confidence but the prediction of malignancy is less reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rulin, M. C, Preston, A. L. Adnexal masses in postmenopausal women. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987; 70: 578–581.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Herrmann, U. J., Locher, G. W., Golghirsch, A. Sonographic patterns of ovarian tumours: Prediction of malignancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987; 69: 777–781.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andolf, E., Jorgensen, C. A. Prospective comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound with surgical findings in gynecologic disease. J. Ultrasound Med. 1990; 9: 71–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobs, I., Oram, D., Fairbanks, J., Turner, J., Frost, C., Grundzinskas, J. G. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990; 97: 922–929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meire, H. B., Farrant, P., Guha, T. Distinction of benign from malignant ovarian cysts by ultrasound. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987; 85: 893–894.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andolf, E., Jorgensen, C. Simple adnexal cysts diagnosed by ultrasound in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1988; 16: 301–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, J. Y., Angel, C., DuBeshter, B., Walsh, C. Diagnosis after laparotomy for a mass in the pelvic area in women. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1993; 176: 333–338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sassone, A. M., Timor-Tritsch, I. E., Artner, A., Westhoff, C., Warren, W. Transvaginal sonographic characterisation of ovarian disease: Evaluation of an new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 78: 70–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiner, Z., Thaler, I., Beck, D., Rottefn, S., Deutsch, M., Brandes, J. Differentiating malignant from benign ovarian tumours with transvaginal colour flow imaging. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992; 79: 159–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ong, S., Duffy, T. & Murphy, J. Transabdominal ultrasound and its correlation with clinical findings in gynaecology. I J M S 165, 268–270 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943087

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943087

Keywords

Navigation