Conclusions
In summary, it appears that the microbial reduction process is not competitive with conventional SO2-reduction techniques when AD-MSS medium is used as the feedstock hydrogen source. This is owing not to the intrinsic cost of the medium, but to the low concentration of fermentable substrates in this medium when prepared as previously described (7). The greatest incremental decrease in costs of the microbial SO2-reduction process would result from a decrease in the hydraulic loading to the bioreactors. Potentially this could be achieved by increasing the concentration of fermentable substrates in the AD-MSS medium through improvements in the anaerobic digestion process by which the medium is produced. Process economics could also be improved by increasing the SRB concentration in the process culture to >30 wt%. This would result in reduced bioreactor volume required and lower capital costs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Drummond, C. J., Yeh, J. T., Joubert, J. I. and Ratafia-Brown, J. A. (1985), “The design of a dry regenerative fluidized-bed copper oxide process for the removal of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from coal-fired boilers,” June, 78th Annual Meeting, Air Pollution Control Association.
Dasu, B. N. and Sublette, K. L. (1989),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 34, 405–409.
Dasu, B. N. and Sublette, K. L. (1989),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 20/21, 207–220.
Maddox, R. N. (1974),Gas and Liquid Sweetening, Campbell Petroleum Series, Norman, OK.
Deshmane, V. V., Lee, C.-M., and Sublette, K. L. (1992),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 39/40, 739–752.
Sublette, K. L. and Gwozdz, K. J. (1991),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 635–646.
Selvaraj, P. T. and Sublette, K. L. (1995),Biotechnol. Prog. 11, 153–158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selvaraj, P.T., Sublette, K.L. An economic analysis of microbial reduction of sulfur dioxide with anaerobically digested sewage biosolids as electron donor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57, 1003–1012 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941780
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941780