Skip to main content
Log in

Reactor comparisons for the biodegradation of thiodiglycol, a product of mustard gas hydrolysis

  • Session 5 Environmental Biotechnology
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An environmentally benign method for the mineralization of sulfur mustard has been proposed involving chemical hydrolysis of sulfur mustard to thiodiglycol, and then the biological degradation of thiodiglycol to generate biomass and gaseous carbon dioxide.Alcaligenes xylosoxidans (SH91) was isolated based on its ability to utilize thiodiglycol as a sole carbon source. This article compares different biological reactor designs and experimentally assesses their relative effectiveness in degrading thiodiglycol using pure cultures of SH91. The reactor configurations studied are batch, continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR), and CSTR with cell recycle. From the results, it is clear that the CSTR with cell recycle offers superior performance for a given residence time or volume. These pure culture data are necessary for accurate design of a pilot-scale system where mixed cultures will be employed because of a possible incomplete chemical hydrolysis step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bentley, W. E., Bunnett, J. F., DeFrank, J. J., von Fahnestock, M., Haley, M. V., Harvey, S. P., Issacson, L., Kilbane, J. J., Kolakowski, J. E., Labare, M. P., Ontiveros, J.-L., and Wild, J. R. (1994),Proceedings of the 1993 Scientific Conference on Chemical Defense Research, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, pp. 1133–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harvey, S. and DeFrank, J. J. (1993), inArmy Science: The New Frontiers, Military and Civilian Applications, Kamely, D. and Sasmor, R., eds., Borg Biomedical Services, Richmond, VA, pp. 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, T., Weigand, W. A., Bentley, W. E., and Harvey, S. P. (1996), Bioreactor strategies for the degradation of thiodiglycol, the main hydrolysis product of sulfur mustard. (submitted).

  4. Sines, B. J., Teather, E. W., Harvey, S. P., and Weigand, W. A. (1994),Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 45/46, 881–895.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, T. (1994), UsingAlcaligenes xylosoxidans (SH91) to degrade thiodiglycol. MS Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yano, T. and Koga, S. (1969),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11, 139–153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey, J. E. and Ollis, D. F. (1977),Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals, MacGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pham, MQ.K., Harvey, S.P., Weigand, W.A. et al. Reactor comparisons for the biodegradation of thiodiglycol, a product of mustard gas hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57, 779–789 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941758

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941758

Index Entries

Navigation