Abstract
In this article, a study of the dynamics of the immobilization of mesophilic anaerobic bacteria was conducted. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) ground to fine particles was used as immobilization support in an inverse fluidized bed. After 135 d of immobilization, the biomass concentration attained was 375 μg protein/g dry plastic support. The specific rate for acetate consumption was 0.008 μmol acetate/μg protein/h. The kinetic parameters of the bioparticles (K c = 1.067 mM andV max = 0.00754 μmol acetate/μg protein/h) were estimated by the initial rate method at different acetate concentrations and were compared to the values obtained by a direct parameter estimation method from the dynamic assays for acetate consumption with an initial substrate concentration of 10 mM. The particles were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate the biofilm qualitatively. The SEM studies showed that the surface and cavities of the support were colonized, and the bacterial structures found were bacilli similar toMethanothrix as the predominant microorganism and a few groups ofMethanosarcina-like cocci. TheK s value found is between those reported for the predominant bacterial group immobilized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Henze, M. and Herremöes, P. (1983),Water Sci. Technol. 15, 1–101.
Gorris, L. G. M., Van Deursen, J. M. A., van der Drift, C., and Vogels, G. D. (1989),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 33, 687–693.
Binot, R. A., Bol, T., Naveau, H. P., and Nyns, E. J. (1983),Water Sci. Technol. 15, 103–115.
Iza, J. (1991), inAnanerobic Treatment Technology for Municipal and Industrial Wastewater, Switzenbaum, M. S., ed., International Association on Water Pollution Research and Control, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, pp. 109–132.
Guiot, S. (1992), Bioimmobilization in Anaerobic Reactors.Bioprocesos Anaerobios para el Tratamiento de Efluentes Industriales. UAM/IMP/ORSTOM. May 6–7, Mexico City.
Rubindamayugi, M. S. T., Op Den Camp, H. J. M., Lubberding, H. J., Gijzen, H. J., and Vogels, G. D. (1992),Water Sci. Technol. 25(1), 99–106.
Shapiro, M. and Switzenbaum, M. S. (1984),Biotechnol. Lett. 6(11), 729–734.
Verrier, D., Mortier, B., Dubourguier, H. C., and Albagnac, W. (1988), inProceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion. Hall, E. R. and Hobson, P. N., eds., Pergamon, Oxford, UK, pp. 61–69.
González, G., Ramírez, F., and Monroy, O. (1992),Biotechnol. Lett. 14(2), 149–154.
Meier-Schneiders, M., Busch, C., and Diekert, G. (1993),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38, 667–673.
Zellner, G., Diekman, H., Austermann-Haun, U., and Seyfried, C. F. (1994),Biotechnol. Lett. 16(3), 611–620.
Balch, W. E., Fox, G. E., Magrum, L. J., Woese, C. R., and Wolfe, R. S. (1979),Microbiol. Rev. 43(2), 260–296.
APHA-AWWA-WPCF. (1988),Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th ed. Greenberg, A. E., Trussell, R. R., Clesceri, L. S., and Franson, A. A. H., eds., Port City Press, Baltimore, MD.
Sedmark, J. J. and Grossberg, S. E. (1977),Anal. Biochem. 79, 544–552.
Counotte, G. H. M. and Prins, R. A. (1979),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 38(4), 758–760.
Pavlostathis, S. G. and Giraldo-Gómez, E. (1991), inAnanerobic Treatment Technology for Municipal and Industrial Wastewater, Switzenbaum, M. S., ed., International Association on Water Pollution Research and Control. Pergamon, Oxford, UK, pp. 35–60.
Guyot, J. P., Noyola, A., and Monroy, O. (1990),Biotechnol. Lett. 12, 155–160.
Kuba, T., Furumai, H., and Kusuda, T. (1990),Water Res. 24(11), 1365–1372.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meraz, M., González-Barrera, A., Alvarez-Ramirez, J. et al. Dynamics of the immobilization of anaerobic meshopilic bacteria on a plastic support. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57, 525–534 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941732
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941732