Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can a computer diagnosis of “Normal ECG” be trusted?

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A computerised system which can reliably identify normal tracings would substantially improve the ease and efficiency of electrocardiographic reporting. Normal tracings with a report can be given directly to the patient without the delay of reporting and the expense of postage and delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, J. J., Horton, M., Itscoitz, S. B. 1974. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretaion. Circulation. 50, 88–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, T. M. 1983. EKG Computers: a public health hazard. Southern Med. J. 76, 696–698.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, R. E., Crevasse, K., Ferrer, M. I., Greenfield, J. D. 1972. A new computer program for analysis of scalar electrocardiograms. Comput. Biomed. Res. 5, 629–653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caceres, C. A. 1973. The case against electrocardiographic automation. Computer. 6, 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carel, R. S., Drory, Y., Mjller, H., Kaplinski, E. 1978. Utilization of an Automated ECG Interpretation System in an Ambulatory Health Service. Med. Prog. Technol. 6, 35–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. M. 1983. Symposium on computer applications to cardiology. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 25, 361–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marandapalli, R. S., Flowers, N. C. 1984. Computerized Electrocardiographic Analysis. Modern Concepts of Cardiovascular Disease. 53, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D., Reardon, B., Mulcahy, R., Kavanagh, B. Graham. 1986. Can a computer assisted electrocardiograph replace a cardiologist for ECG measurements? Irish. J. Med. Sci. 155, 410–414.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rataharju, P. M. 1978. The impact of computers on electrocardiography. Eur. J. Cardiol. 8, 237- 248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, J. L., Arnaud, P., van Bemmel, J. H.et al. 1985. Assessment of the performance of electrocardiographic computer programs with the use of a reference data base. Circulation 71. 523–534.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Cardiac Departments of St. Vincent’s Hospital, and of the Adelaide and Meath Hospitals, and the Department of Computer Science, University College, Dublin

    D. Mulcahy, R. Mulcahy, B. Reardon & I. Graham Dr.

Authors
  1. D. Mulcahy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Mulcahy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Reardon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Graham Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulcahy, D., Mulcahy, R., Reardon, B. et al. Can a computer diagnosis of “Normal ECG” be trusted?. I.J.M.S. 155, 416–418 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940544

Keywords

Search

Navigation