Skip to main content
Log in

The vacuum extractor — A re-appraisal

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

ONE hundred and twenty-seven patients in whom ventouse (vacuum extractor) delivery was attempted are described. In 121 delivery was completed by the instrument; in 2 it was completed by forceps and in 4 by Caesarean section. The patients were compared with the next registered patient who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery of a baby presenting cephalically and matched for gestational length and parity. There were no significant differences in perinatal mortality or in perinatal, neonatal or maternal morbidity. Follow-up of the babies delivered by the ventouse for at yeast 2 years has shown no abnormalities in development. The continued use of the instrument in the second stage of labour in conjunction with a policy of active management of labour is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, G. L., Willoughby, M. L. N., Kerr, Margaret M. and Hutchinson, J. H. 1969. Massive subaponeurotic haemorrhage in infants born by vacuum extraction. Brit. Med. J. iii, 743–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, G. C. 1976. The importance of flexion in vacuum extractor delivery. Brit. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 83, 194–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, J. A., 1968. The management of malrotation of the occiput. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Brit. Cwealth. 75, 889–891.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, J. A. 1971. The ventouse: The obstetric vacuum extractor. London. Lloyd-Luke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford, P. 1961. The vacuum extractor in the treatment of delay in the first stage of labour. Lancet ii, 1045–1057.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeCosta, C. The vacuum extractor — A re-appraisal. Ir J Med Sci 151, 105–108 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940157

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940157

Keywords

Navigation