Skip to main content
Log in

Limited use of hypertensive excretory urography

  • Published:
Urologic radiology

Abstract

Clinical experience indicates that hypertensive excretory urography is not a satisfactory screening examination to detect patients having hypertension due to renal artery stenosis. Review of the Cooperative Study data indicates the false negative rate for screening was 21.8%. In addition, the prevalence of hypertension caused by renal artery stenosis appears quite low, in the range of 1–3%. Since the objective is to identify patients who will benefit from surgery, clinical sorting strategy should focus on evaluating patients as surgical candidates, not as having the disease. Once that is done, pharmacodynamic renal arteriography is recommended as the first imaging examination to find the renal artery lesion and determine its hemodynamic significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey SM, Evans DW, Fleming HA: Intravenous urography in investigation of hypertension.Lancet 2:57–58, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis PJ, Bulpitt CJ, Sherwood T, Dollery CT: Routine intravenous urography in the investigation of hypertension.J Chronic Dis 29:785–791, 1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stolle E, Gotzen R, Khalil M: Der wert des fruhurogramms bei der abklarung einer arteriellen hypertonie.Fortschr Roentgenstr 127:238–242, 1977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thornbury JR, Stanley JC, Fryback DG: The hypertensive urogram: a nondiscriminatory test for renovascular hypertension,AJR, in press

  5. Bookstein JJ, Abrams HL, Buenger RE, Lecky J, Franklin SS, Reiss MD, Bleifer KH, Klatte EC, Varady PD, Maxwell MH: Radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension. Part 1. Aims and methods of the radiology study group. Part 2. The role of urography in unilateral renovascular disease. Part 3. Appraisal of arteriography. Part 4. Arteriographic complications.JAMA 220:1218–1230;221:368–378 (also220:1195–1204, 1209–1218 for additional parts), 1972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McNeil BJ, Mellins HZ: Evaluation of diagnostic tests in uroradiology.Radiol Clin North Am 17:175–185, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tucker RM, Labarthe DR: Frequency of surgical treatment for hypertension in adults at the Mayo Clinic from 1973 throught 1975.Mayo Clin Proc 52:549–555, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bookstein JJ, Walter JF, Staniey JC, Fry WJ: Pharmacoangiographic manipulation of renal collateral blood flowCirculation 54:328–334, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanley JC, Fry WJ: Renovascular hypertension secondary to arterial fibrodysplasia in adults.Arch Surg 110:922–928, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillman BJ, Ovitt TW, Nudelman S, Fisher HD III, Frost MM, Capp MP, Roehrig H, Seeley G: Digital video subtraction angiography of renal vascular abnormalities.Radiology 139:277–280, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thornbury, J.R., Stanley, J.C. & Fryback, D.G. Limited use of hypertensive excretory urography. Urol Radiol 3, 209–211 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02938804

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02938804

Key words

Navigation