Abstract
We answer a question of T. Jech, showing that (1) there may exist weakly precipitous filters inL, and (2) there may exist a weakly precipitous filter on ω1 in a set-generic extension ofL. Hence, the existence of a weakly precipitous filter on ω1 does not imply the existence of 0#.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
[GH] F. Galvin and A. Hajnal,Inequalities for cardinal power, Ann. of Math.101 (1975), 491–498.
[J] T. Jech,Some properties of k-complete ideals defined in terms of infinite games, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic26 (1984), 31–45.
[JP] T. Jech and K. Prikry,Ideals over uncountable sets: applications of almost disjoint functions and generic ultrapowers, Memoirs Am. Math. Soc.18 (1980), No. 214.
[S] S. Shelah,On power of singular cardinals, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic27 (1986), 263–299.
[S-1] S. Shelah,More on powers of singular cardinals, Isr. J. Math.59 (1987), 299–326.
[Si] J. Silver,On the singular cardinals problem, Proc. Int. Congr. Math. Vancouver, 1974, pp. 265–268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donder, HD., Levinski, JP. On weakly precipitous filters. Israel J. Math. 67, 225–242 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02937297
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02937297