Skip to main content

The utility of head computed tomography in the emergency department evaluation of syncope

Abstract

Objective

Current guidelines for evaluation of syncope recommend that in the absence of objective focal neurologic findings, head computed tomography (HCT) may not be necessary. Compliance with this recommendation is highly variable, which may be due in part to the lack of currently available evidence. We undertook the following investigation to determine whether HCT aids in the diagnostic investigation of syncope.

Methods

This study was a retrospective chart review of all adult patients who presented to an urban emergency department, and who had a HCT ordered for syncope, during a 6-month period in 2001. Patients with competing indications for HCT, or those with a presentation consistent with seizures were excluded. Charts were assigned to the “positive” or “negative” HCT group depending on whether the treating physician considered HCT findings relevant to the syncopal event.

Results

A total of 202 patients had a HCT performed for syncope. Eighty-five patients met one or more of the exclusion criteria. HCT of the remaining 117 patients were analyzed. None of the 117 patients had a HCT finding that was clinically related to the syncopal event.

Conclusions

HCT yielded no relevant clinical findings in our entire sample of patients with syncope. Our findings combined with previous studies add to the growing body of evidence that HCT for syncope in the absence of focal neurologic findings may not be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Kapoor WN, Karpf M, Wieand S, Peterson JR, Levey GS. A prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with syncope.N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 197–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope.N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 878–85.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Linzer M, Yang EH, Estes NA 3rd, Wang P, Vorperian VR, Kapoor WN. Diagnosing syncope. Part 1: Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 989–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kapoor WN, Peterson J, Wieand HS, Karpf M. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of recurrences in patients with syncope.Am J Med 1987; 83: 700–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Linzer M, Felder A, Hackel A, et al. Psychiatric syncope: a new look at an old disease.Psychosomatics 1990; 31: 181–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oh JH, Hanusa BH, Kapoor WN. Do symptoms predict cardiac arrhythmias and mortality in patients with syncope?Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 375–80.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaitkevicius PV, Esserwein DM, Maynard AK, O'Connor FC, Fleg JL. Frequency and importance of postprandial blood pressure reduction in elderly nursing-home patients.Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 865–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapoor WN, Cha R, Peterson JR, Wieand HS, Karpf M. Prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring in patients with syncope. Importance of frequent or repetitive ventricular ectopy.Am J Med 1987; 82: 20–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin TP, Hanusa BH, Kapoor WN. Risk stratification of patients with syncope.Ann Emerg Med 1997; 29: 459–66.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubenstein JJ, Schulman CL, Yurchak PM, DeSanctis RW. Clinical spectrum of the sick sinus syndrome.Circulation 1972; 46: 5–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ben-Chetrit E, Flugelman M, Eliakim M. Syncope: a retrospective study of 101 hospitalized patients.Isr J Med Sci 1985; 21: 950–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapoor WN. Evaluation and management of the patient with syncope.JAMA 1992; 268: 2553–60.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Giglio P, Bednarczyk EM, Weiss K, Bakshi R. Syncope and head CT scans in the emergency department.Emerg Radiol 2005; 12: 44–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pires LA, Ganji JR, Jarandila R, Steele R. Diagnostic patterns and temporal trends in the evaluation of adult patients hospitalized with syncope.Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 1889–95.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kapoor WN. Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope.Medicine (Baltimore) 1990; 69: 160–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Linzer M, Yang EH, Estes NA 3rd, Wang P, Vorperian VR, Kapoor WN. Diagnosing syncope. Part 2: Unexplained syncope. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 76–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG, et al., for the Task Force on Syncope, European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope-update 2004. Executive summary.Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 2054–72

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW. Spiral (helical) CT.Radiology 1993; 189: 647–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rydberg J, Buckwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, et al. Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications.Radiographics 2000; 20: 1787–806.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson E, Rotenbeg Z, Fuchs J, Weinberger I, Agmon J. Transient ischemic attack-related syncope.Clin Cardiol 1991; 14: 141–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Day SC, Cook EF, Funkenstein H, Goldman L. Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness.Am J Med 1982; 73: 15–23.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eagle KA, Black HR. The impact of diagnostic tests in evaluating patients with syncope.Yale J Biol Med 1983; 56: 1–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kapoor WN, Karpf M, Maher Y, Miller RA, Levey GS. Syncope of unknown origin. The need for a more cost-effective approach to its diagnosis evaluation.JAMA 1982; 247: 2687–91.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.JAMA 2005; 293: 2609–17.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikhil Goyal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goyal, N., Donnino, M.W., Vachhani, R. et al. The utility of head computed tomography in the emergency department evaluation of syncope. Int Emergency Med 1, 148 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936543

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936543

Key words

  • computed tomography
  • emergency medicine
  • syncope