Advertisement

Sex Roles

, 37:921 | Cite as

Police officers’ judgements of blame in family violence: The impact of gender and alcohol

  • Anna Stewart
  • Kelly Maddren
Article

Abstract

This study investigated police officers‘ judgements of blame to both victims and assailants of family violence. Furthermore, the impact of these judgements on the reported likelihood of charging the assailants with assault was examined. The sample was selected from operational police officers of the Queensland Police Service. The sample included 51 male officers and 46 female officers. Ethnicity was not examined. However; 1.3% of police oficers identify as Indigenous and 5.8% of officers come from non-English speaking backgrounds. The subjects were presented with one of eight case vignettes of assault. In these vignettes two factors were varied, the victim gender (male and female), and alcohol consumption of the victim and assailant (both the assailant and the victim were drunk, neither were drunk, the assailant was sober and the victim drunk, and the assailant was drunk and the victim sober). A third independent variable was included, gender of the police officer Male and female police officers showed no differences in judgement of blame and reported likelihood of charging. However; the level of blame attributed to both the assailant and the victim vaned with the victim gender and the alcohol consumption of the disputants. Male victims were more likely to be blamed than female victims. Drunk victims were blamed more than sober victims. Furthermore,a relationship was found between the level of blame allocated to the victim and the reported likelihood of charging the assailant. These results indicate that police officers hold gender stereotypes that influence the way they respond to family violence.

Keywords

Domestic Violence Police Officer Family Violence Female Victim Victim Blame 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aramburu, B. E, & Leigh, B. C. (1991). For better or worse: Attributions about drinking aggression toward female and male victims.Violence and Victims, 6, 31–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berk, S., & Loseke, D. (1981). ‘Handling’ family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances.Law Society Review, 15, 317–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, D. (1980).The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1990).Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Cohn, E., & Sugarman, D. (1980). Abusing the one you love.Victimobgy, 5, 203–212.Google Scholar
  6. Corenblum, B. (1983). Reactions to alcohol related marital violence: Effects on one’s own abuse experience and alcohol problems on causal attributions.Journal of Studies in Alcohol, 44, 664–674.Google Scholar
  7. Critchlow, B (1985). The blame in the bottle: Attributions about drunken behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 258–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grace, S. (1995).Policing domestic violence in the 1990’s. Home Office Research Study 139. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  9. Hart, B. (1993). Battered women and the criminal justice system.American Behavioral Science, 36, 624–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillier, L., & Foddy, M. (1993). The role of observer attitudes in judgements of blame in cases of wife assault.Sex Roles, 29, 629–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howard, J. A. (1984a). Societal influences on attribution: Blaming some victims more than others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 494–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard, J. A. (1984b). The ‘normal’ victim: The effects of gender stereotypes on reactions to victims.Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 270–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ireland, C. S. (1995) Alcohol and its contribution to violence: New directions for policing alcohol-related violence, crime and anti-social behavior in New South Wales. In D. Chappell & S Egger (eds.),Australian Violence: Contemporary Perspectives II. Australian Institute of Criminology: CanberraGoogle Scholar
  14. Kantor, G. K., & Straus, M. A. (1987). The ‘drunken bum’ theory of wife beating.Social Problems, 34, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kraus, S. J. (1995) Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kristiansen, C., & Giulietti, R. (1990). Perceptions of wife abuse: Effects of gender, attitudes towards women, and just world beliefs among college students.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lavoie, E, Jacob, M., Hardy J., & Martin, G. (1989). Police attitudes in assigning responsibility for wife abuse.Journal of Family Violence, 4, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leigh, B. C, & Aramburu, B. (1994). Responsibility attributions for drunken behavior: The role of expectancy violation.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lerner, M. J. (1980).The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  20. Morley, R., & Mullender, A. (1994).Preventing domestic violence to women. Police Research Group Crime Prevention Series: Paper No. 48. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  21. Olsen, C. L. (1976). On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 83, 579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pagelow, M. D. (1989) The incidence and prevalence of criminal abuse of other family members. In L. Ohlin & M. Tbnry (eds.),Family violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Richardson, D. C, & Campbell, J. L. (1980). Alcohol and wife abuse: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for wife abuse.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sherman, L. W. (1992).Policing domestic violence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Stanko, E. A., & Hobdell, K. (1993). Assault on men: Masculinity and male victimisation.British Journal of Criminology, 33, 400–415.Google Scholar
  27. Stewart, A., & Homel, R. (1995). Correlates of victimisation for crimes against the person: An analysis of the 1991 Queensland Crime Victim Survey. In Criminal Justice Commission (ed.).Crime Victim Surveys in Australia; Proceedings of a conference held 28–29 November 1994. Brisbane: Criminal Justice CommissionGoogle Scholar
  28. Waaland, R, & Keeley, S. (1985). Police decision making in wife abuse: The impact of legal and extralegal factors.Law and Human Behavior, 9, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wortley, R. (1997). Attributions as a function of expertise: the case of the police decision to arrest.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 525–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Stewart
    • 1
  • Kelly Maddren
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Criminal Justice AdministrationMt. Gravatt Campus, Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  2. 2.Griffith UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations