Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Economic Botany
  3. Article
Ethnobotany of purple coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia, Asteraceae) and OtherEchinacea Species
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological data of Armoracia rusticana P. Gaertner, B. Meyer et Scherb. in Hungary and Romania: a case study

26 June 2018

Nóra Papp, Sándor Gonda, … Gábor Vasas

Carqueja (Baccharis sect. Caulopterae), a critical review of its history, phytochemistry and medicinal use: problems of ethnopharmacology in Latin America

14 June 2019

Jan Schripsema, Marianna Almeida Lemos, … Fernando J. Luna

Piper guineense- an underutilized aromatic spice with medicinal value

18 June 2021

Philippa Chinyere Ojimelukwe

Origanum spp.: an update of their chemical and biological profiles

30 March 2018

Mariangela Marrelli, Giancarlo A. Statti & Filomena Conforti

Morus alba: a comprehensive phytochemical and pharmacological review

06 March 2023

Gaber El-Saber Batiha, Ali Esmail Al-Snafi, … Marios Papadakis

Ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry, pharmacological properties and toxicology of Curcuma caesia Roxb.: a review

13 August 2022

Zainol Haida, Jaafar Juju Nakasha, … Mansor Hakiman

Corn poppy, Papaver rhoeas L.: a critical review of its botany, phytochemistry and pharmacology

22 May 2020

Laura Grauso, Bruna de Falco, … Virginia Lanzotti

A systematic documentation on a rare medicinal plant Acacia ferruginea: a ready reckoner

01 June 2022

M. Jeevitha & Shubashini K. Sripathi

Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of genus Fritillaria—a review

12 July 2021

Ishrat Rashid & Ubaid Yaqoob

Download PDF
  • Published: October 1989

Ethnobotany of purple coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia, Asteraceae) and OtherEchinacea Species

La etnobotánica de laEchinacea angustifolia (Asteraceae) y los otros Echinaceaespecies

  • Kelly Kindscher1 

Economic Botany volume 43, pages 498–507 (1989)Cite this article

  • 399 Accesses

  • 44 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The purple coneflower, Echinacea angustifolia, was the most widely used medicinal plant of the Plains Indians. It was used for a variety of ailments, including toothache, coughs, colds, sore throats, snakebite, and as a painkiller. H. C. F. Meyer used it as a patent medicine in the 1870s and introduced it to the medical profession. Recent scientific research (mostly German) onEchinacea species has shown that they possess immunostimulatory activity. Increased cultivation ofE. purpurea andE. angustifolia may be needed to meet the increased demand for its roots and to alleviate the effects of overharvesting of wild stands.

Resumen

Echinacea angustifolia fue la planta medicinal más usada de los indios de Ia pradera norteamericana. Se usó para curar una variedad de enfermedades, incluso el dolor de muelas, el dolor de garganta, la mordedura de serpiente, y como un quita dolores. H. C. F. Meyer la usó como una medicina patentada en los años 1870 y se la intrudujo a la profesión de medicina. Recientes investigaciones cientificas (Ia mayorIa en Alemania) sobre las especies de Echinacea han demostrado que éslas posean un efecto estimulante en el sistema de inmunidad. Es posible que sea necesario más y más cultivo deE. purpurea y E. angustifolia para satisfacer la demanda creciente de las ralces y para mitigar los efectos de la recolección de las poblaciones silvestres.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Literature Cited

  • Bauer, V. R., I. A. Khan, and H. Wagner. 1987. Echinacea: Nachweis einer Verfalschung vonEchinacea purpurea (L.) Moench mitParthenium integrifolium L. Deutsche Apotheker-Zeitung 127:1325–1330.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, J. H. 1921. Comment on the paper by Couch and Giltner on ’An experimental study of echinacea therapy’. Amer. J. Pharm. 93:229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beringer, G. M. 1911. Fluid extract of echinacea. Amer. J. Pharm. 83:324.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, A. 1987. President’s column. Missouri Prairie J. 8:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonadeo, I., G. Bottazzi, and M. Lavazza. 1971. Echinacin B, an active polysaccharide for echinacea. Revista Ital. Essenze Profumi, Piante Off., Aromi, Saponi, Cosmetici, Aerosol 53:281–295.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. G., and V. H. Jones. 1939. Some notes on uses of plants by the Comanche Indians. Annual Rep. Michigan Acad. Sci. 25:517–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, J. F., and L. T. Giltner. 1920. An experimental study of echinacea therapy. J. Agric. Res. 20(l):63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry. 1909. Echinacea considered valueless. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 53:1836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felter, H. W. 1898. The newer materia medica. I. Echinacea. Ecl. Med. J. 58:79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. 1985. Echinacea exalted! Ozard Beneficial Plant Project, New Life Farm, Brixey, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, M. 1913a. A study in the ethnobotany of the Omaha Indians. Collect. Nebraska State Hist. Soc. 17:314–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1913b. Some native Nebraska plants with their uses by the Dakota. Collect. Nebraska State Hist. Soc. 17:358–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1977. Uses of plants by the Indians of the Missouri River region. Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln. Reprint of a work first published as Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 33rd Annual Rep., Washington, DC, in 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Univ. Press of Kansas, Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, G. B. 1962. The Cheyenne Indians. Vol. 2. Cooper Square Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. A. 1976. Montana: native plants and early peoples. Montana Historical Society, Helena.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981. The ethnobotany of the northern Cheyenne Indians of Montana. J. Ethnopharmacol. 4:1–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, A. 1947. Plant products for insecticidal properties and summary of results to date. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. PI. Res. 15:21–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, F. V. 1859. Botany. Pages 726–747 in Report of the [U.S.] Secretary of War, 35th Congress, 2nd Session, 1858–1859, Senate Executive Document, Vol. 3, No. 1, Part 3.

  • Heyl, F. W., and M. C. Hart. 1915. Some constituents ofBrauneria angustifolia. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 37(7):1769–1778.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. 1954. Occurrence of a pungent insecticidal principle in American coneflower roots. Science 120:125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. U. 1904. History ofEchinacea angustifolia. Amer. J. Phar. 76(1):15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1917. A treatise on Echinacea. Lloyd Brothers Drug Treatise 20.

  • McGregor, R. L. 1968. The taxonomy of the genusEchinacea (Compositae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 48(4): 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H. CF. 1887.Echinacea angustifolia. Ecl. Med. J. 83:315–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moring, S. E. 1984. Echinacea, a natural immune stimulant and treatment for viral infection. Botica Analytica, Sunnyvale, CA.

  • Munson, P. J. 1981. Contributions to Osage and Lakota ethnobotany. Plains Anthropol. 26:229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, R. K. 1974. Plant resource utilization at a late prehistoric site in north-central South Dakota. Master’s thesis, Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. J. 1980. Lakota names and traditional uses of native plants by Sicangu (Brule) people in the Rosebud area, South Dakota. Rosebud Educational Society, St. Francis, SD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, L. E. 1897. Therapeutical notes and descriptions of parts of medicinal plants growing in Kansas. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 16:85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1903. Echinacea roots. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 19:209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. H. 1928. Ethnobotany of the Meskwaki. Bull. Publ. Mus., City of Milwaukee 4(2): 175–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, A., J. Renz, and A. Brack. 1950. Antibacterial substances II. Isolation and constitution of echinacoside, glycoside from the roots ofEchinacea angustifolia. Helv. Chim. Acta 33:1877–1893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, V. E. 1981. The honest herbal. Stickley, Philadelphia.

  • —. 1986. Plant drugs in the twenty-first century. Econ. Bot. 40(3):279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestal, P. A., and R. E. Schultes. 1939. The economic botany of the Kiowa Indians. Harvard Botanical Museum, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voaden, D. J., and M. Jacobson. 1972. Tumor inhibitors 3. Identification and synthesis of an oncolytic hydrocarbon from American coneflower roots. J. Med. Chem. 15(6):619–623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, A., and A. Hilbig. 1978. Virus inhibition byEchinacea purpurea. PI. Med. 33:89–102.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H., and A. Proksch. 1985. Immunostimulatory drugs of fungi and higher plants. Pages 113–153in H. Wagner et al., eds., Economic and medicinal plant research. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, A. Proksch, I. Riess-Maurer, A. Vollmar, S. Odenthal, H. Stuppner, K. Jurcie, M. Le Turdu, and J. N. Fang. 1985. Immunstimulierend wirkende Polysaccharide (Heteroglykane) aus höheren Pflanzen. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 35(8):1069–1075.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, W. R. 1936. An introduction to Pawnee archeology. Bull. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. 112.

  • Woods, E. L. 1930. The chemical constitution of the hydrocarbons ofEchinacea angustifolia. Amer. J. Pharm. 102:611–630.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systematics and Ecology, University of Kansas, 66045, Lawrence, KS

    Kelly Kindscher

Authors
  1. Kelly Kindscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kindscher, K. Ethnobotany of purple coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia, Asteraceae) and OtherEchinacea Species. Econ Bot 43, 498–507 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02935924

Download citation

  • Received: 07 November 1987

  • Accepted: 22 December 1988

  • Issue Date: October 1989

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02935924

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Medicinal Plant
  • Economic Botany
  • Great Plain
  • Patent Medicine
  • Echinacea Purpurea
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 3.238.134.157

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.