Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of autoradiography and DNA histograms in assessing S-phase cells from patients with myeloid leukemias

  • Articles
  • Published:
Medical Oncology and Tumor Pharmacotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The studies reported here were designed to determine whether DNA histogram analysis provided the same estimate for the percentage of cells in S-phase as does3H-TdR labeling index (LI). For DNA histogram analysis high resolution flow cytometry was employed together with 3 different computer based methods for histogram analysis. When tissue culture cells were employed there was a good correlation (r=0.89) between the estimates for the percentage of cells in S-phase by the LI and DNA histogram techniques. In contrast, when 1138 bone marrow or peripheral blood specimens obtained from leukemic patients were studied the correlation was poor. For example when 243 pretherapy bone marrow aspirate cells were studied by both methods the correlation was only 0.46. A direct comparison of the clinical relevance of the two methods for measuring S-phase cells when high dose cytosine arabinoside therapy was used to treat patients demonstrated that only LI measurements provided clinically useful information. In conclusion, DNA histogram analysis provides an inaccurate estimate of the percentage of cells in S-phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LI:

Labeling index

CR:

complete remission

ANLL:

acute nonlymphocytic leukemia

CML:

chronic myeloid leukemia

H-TdR:

tritiated thymidine

References

  1. Crissman H A, Tobey R A: Cell cycle analysis in 20 minutes.Science 184, 1297 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Krishan A: A rapid flow cytophotometric analysis of mammalian cell cycle by propidium iodide straining.J Cell Biol 66, 188 (1975).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Crissman H A, Steinkamp J A: Rapid, simultaneous measurement of DNA, protein and cell volume in single cells from large mammalian cell populations.J Cell Biol 59, 766 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Braylan R C, Diamond L W, Powell M L, Harty-Golder B: Percentage of cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle in human lymphoma determined by flow cytometry: correlation with labelling index and patient survival.Cytometry 1, 171 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa A, Mazzini D, Del Bino G, Silvestrini R. DNA content and kinetic characteristics of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: determined by flow cytometry and autoradiography.Cytometry 2, 185 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barlogie B, Raber MN, Schumann J, Johnson T S, Drewinko B, Swartzendruber D E, Gohde W, Andreef M, Freireich E J: Flow cytometry in clinical cancer research.Cancer Res 43, 3982 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Andreef M, Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharpless T, Clarkson B, Melamed M R: Discrimination of human leukemia subtypes by flow cytometric analysis of cellular DNA and RNA.Blood 55, 282 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fried J, Mandel M. Multi-user system for analysis of data from flow cytometry.Comp Prog Biomed 10, 218 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dean P N, Jett J H: Mathematical analysis of DNA distributions derived from flow microfluorometry.J Cell Biol 60, 523 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson M B, Myers S M, Galbraith P R: A simple method for analysis of DNA histograms in human myeloid cells perturbed by stimulators of DNA synthesis.Cell Tissue Kinet 16, 229 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bryant J, Guseman Jr L F, Egle D L: Analysis of FCM-derived DNA histograms.Flow Cytometry IV, 138 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baisch H, Gohde W, Linden W A: Analysis of PCP-data to determine the fraction of cells in the various phases of cell cycle.Rad Environ Biophys 12, 31 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hart J S, Schumann J, Freireich E J: Ethidium bromide (EB) and mithramycin (MI) for DNA histograms of hemopoietic cells.Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 114 (1976).

  14. Andreef M: Teilsynchronisation durch bleomycin: Untersuch ungen det DNA-synthese und zellzykuskinetik am Ehrlich-Lettre-Ascites tumor. First Deutsches Bleomycin Symposium, Munich (1973).

  15. Dean P N: A simplified method of DNA distribution analysis.Cell Tissue Kinet 13, 299 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Preisler H D, Bjornsson S, Henderson E S, Hyrniuk W, Higby D J: Remission induction in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: comparison of a 7 day and 10 day infusion of cytosine arabinoside in combination with adriamycin.Med Ped Onc 7, 269 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Preisler H D, Early A P, Raza A, Vlahides G, Marinello M J, Stein A M, Browman G: Therapy for secondary acute non-lymphocytic leukemia with cytosine arabinoside.New Engl J Med 308, 21 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohnuma T, Rosner F, Levy R N,et al: Treatment of adult acute leukemia withl-asparaginase.Cancer Chemother Rep 55, 269 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Preisler H D: Failure of remission induction in acute myelocytic leukemia.Med Ped Onc 4, 275 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Preisler H D: Prediction of response to chemotherapy in acute myelocytic leukemia.Blood 56, 361 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc:Model 2150Computer System Operator’s Manual, Vol. 5, pp. 92–94, June (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baisch H, Beck H P, Christensen I J,et al: A comparison of mathematical methods for the analysis of DNA histograms obtained by flow cytometry.Cell Tissue Kinet 15, 235 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Baisch H, Beck H P, Christensen I J,et al: Comparison of evaluation methods for DNA histograms measured by flow cytometry.Flow Cytometry IV, 152 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Preisler H D, Azarnia N, Raza A, Grunwald H, Vogler R, Browman G, Goldberg J,et al: Relationship between the percent of marrow cells in S-phase and the outcome of remission induction, therapy for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia.Br J Haemat 56, 399 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hagenbeak A, Martens A C M, Van Bekkum D W: Separation of normal hemopoietic stem cells from clonogenic leukemic cells in a rat. Model for human acute myelocytic leukemia—I. Velocity sedimentation.Leukemia Res 5, 421 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barlogie B, Spitzer G, Hart J S, Johnston D A, Buchner T, Schumann J, Drewinko B: DNA histogram analysis of human hemopoietic cells.Blood 48, 245 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barlogie B, Drewinko B, Johnston D A, Freireich E J: The effect of adriamycin on the cell cycle traverse of a human lymphoid cell line.Cancer Res 36, 1975 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ritch P S, Shackney S E, Schuette W H, Talbot T L, Smith C A: A practical graphical method for estimating the fraction of cells in S in DNA histograms from clinical tumor samples containing aneuploid cell populations.Cytometry 4, 66 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schuette W H, Shackney S E, MacCollum M A, Smith C A: High resolution method for the analysis of DNA histograms that is suitable for the detection of multiple aneuploid G1 peaks in clinical samples.Cytometry 3, 376 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Braylan R C, Benson N A, Nourse V A. Flow cytometry: a new approach towards characterizing lymphomas. B and T cell tumors, in Vitetta E S (ed.):UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. XXIV, pp. 73–77 (1982).

  31. Sheck L E, Muirhead K A, Horan P K: Evaluation of the S-phase distribution of flow cytometric DNA histograms by autoradiography and computer algorithms.Cytometry 1, 109 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jett J H, Gurley L R: An improved sum-of-normals techni ue for cell cycle distribution analysis of flow cytometric DNA histograms.Cell Tissue Kinet 14, 413 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lindmo T: Kinetics of protein and DNA synthesis studied by mathematical modeling of flow cytometric protein and DNA histograms.Cell Tissue Kinet 15, 197 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Scholz K U: Data analysis of two-parameter flow cytometric measurements.Analyt Quant Cytol 3, 323 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gray J W: Cell cycle analysis of perturbed cell populations: computer simulation of sequential DNA distributions.Cell Tissue Kinet 9, 499 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Watson J V: The application of age distribution theory in the analysis of cytofluorimetric DNA histogram data.Cell Tissue Kinet 10, 157 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lindmo T, Aarries E: Selection of optimal model for the DNA histogram by analysis of error of estimated parameters.J Histochem Cytochem 27, 297 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raza, A., Raza, A.S., Kuliczkowski, K. et al. Comparison of autoradiography and DNA histograms in assessing S-phase cells from patients with myeloid leukemias. Med. Oncol. & Tumor Pharmacother. 2, 269–279 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02934913

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02934913

Key words

Navigation