Abstract
Existing methods for optimization of sequences by random mutagenesis generate libraries with a small number of mostly deleterious mutations, resulting in libraries containing a large fraction of non-functional clones that explore only a small part of squence space. Large numbers of clones need to be screened to find the rare mutants with improvements. Library display formats are useful to screen very large libraries but impose screening limitations that limit the value of this approach for most commercial applications. By contrast, in both classical breeding and in DNA shuffling, natural diversity is permutated by homologous recombination, generating libraries of very high quality, from which improved clones can be identified with a small number of complex screens. Given that this small number of screens can be performed under the conditions of actual use of the product, commercially relevant improvements can be reliably obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stemmer, W. P. C. (1995) Searching sequence space.Bio/Technology 13: 549–553.
Stemmer, W. P. C. (1994) DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly:In vitro recombination for molecular evolution.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 10747–10751.
Stemmer, W. P. C. (1994) Rapid evolution of a proteinin vitro by DNA shuffling.Nature 370: 389–391.
Crameri, A., E. Whitehorn, E. Tate, and W. P. C. Stemmer (1996) Improved green fluorescent protein by molecular evolution using DNA shuffling.Nature Biotechnol. 14: 315–319.
Zhang, J., G. Dawes, and W. P. C. Stemmer (1997) Evolution of an effective fucosidase from a galactosidase by DNA shuffling and screening.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 4504–4509.
Crameri, A., G. Dawes, E. Rodriguez, S. Silver, and W. P. C. Stemmer (1997) Molecular evolution of an arsenate detoxification pathway by DNA shuffling.Nature Biotechnol. 15: 436–438.
Crameri, A., S.-A. Raillard, E. Bermudez, and W. P. C. Stemmer (1998) DNA shuffling of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution.Nature 391: 288–291.
Stemmer, W. P. C., A. Crameri, K. D. Ha, T. M. Brennan, and H. L. Heyneker (1995) Single-step PCR assembly of a gene and a whole plasmid from large numbers of oligonucleotides.Gene 164: 49–53.
Christians, F. C., L. Scapozza, A. Crameri, G. Folkers, and W. P. C. Stemmer (1999) Directed evolution of thymidine kinase for AZT phosphorylation using DNA family shuffling.Nature Biotechnol. 17: 259–264.
Ness, J., M. Welch, L. Giver, M. Bueno, J. Cherry, T. Borchert, W. P. C. Stemmer, and J. Minshull (1999) Creation of a functionally diverse enzyme library by DNA family shuffling.Nature Biotechnol. 17: 893–896.
Chang, C.-C., T. T. Chen, B. W. Cox, G. N. Dawes, W. P. C. Stemmer, J. Punnonen, and P. A. Patten (1999) Rapid evolution of a cytokine using molecular breeding.Nature Biotechnol. 17: 793–797.
Soong, N.-W., L. Nomura, K. Pekrun, M. Reed, L. Sheppard, G. Dawes, and W. P. C. Stemmer (2000) Mole-cular breeding of viruses.Nature Genetics 25: 436–439.
Powell, S. K., M. A. Kaloss, A. Pinkstaff, R. McKee, I. Burimski, M. Pensiero, E. Otto, W. P. C. Stemmer, and N.-W. Soong (2000) Breeding of retroviruses by DNA shuffling for improved stability and processing yields.Nature Biotechnol. 18: 1279–1282.
Stemmer, W. P. C. and N.-W. Soong (1999) Molecular breeding of viruses for targeting and other clinical properties.Tumor Targeting 4: 59–62.
Zhang, Y.-X., K. Perry, V. A. Vinci, K. Powell, W. P. C. Stemmer, and S. B. del Cardayre (2002) Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria.Nature 415: 644–646.
Raillard, S., A. Krebber, Y. Chen, J. E. Ness, E. Bermudez, R. Trinidad, R. Fullem, C. Davis, M. Welch, J. Seffernick, L. P. Wackett, W. P. C. Stemmer, and J. Minshull (2001) Novel enzyme activities and functional plasticity revealed by recombining highly homologous enzymes.Chemistry Biol. 125: 1–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stemmer, W.P.C. Molecular breeding of genes, pathways and genomes by DNA shuffling. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 7, 121–129 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932909
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932909