Abstract
The paper makes a few comments on the characterizations of the log-change index numbers, and then builds up a link between the log-change indexes and the factorial indexes (Stuvel's indexes). It is also suggestedinter alia that log-change index numbers tend to ignore the effect of interaction between price and quantity (consumption) on the expenditure, in contrast to what is admitted by the factorial model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee, K. S. (1977): On the factorial approach providing the true index of cost of living. (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht) Göttingen (2nd Edition 1980).
Banerjee, K. S. (1979a): A note on the Divisia indices. Statistische Hefte 20, 172–175.
Banerjee, K. S. (1979b): An interpreation of the factorial indexes in the light of Divisia integral indexes. Statistische Hefte 20, 261–269.
Sato, K. (1976): The ideal log-change index number, Review of Economics and Statistics 59, 223–228.
Sato, K. (1980): The “natural” index and utility functions, Statistische Hefte 21, 117–126.
Stuvel, G. (1957): A new index number formula, Econometrica 25, 123–131.
Theil, H. (1974): More on log-change index numbers. Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 552–554.
Vartia, Y. (1974): Ideal log-change index numbers. Mimeo.
Vartia, Y. (1976): Ideal log-change index numbers. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 3, 121–126.
Vogt, A. (1978): Divisia indexes on different paths. In: Theory and Applications of Economic Indices (eds.: W. Eichhorn et al.), Würzburg, Wien; 297–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banerjee, K.S. Some observations on the log-change index numbers and their connection with the factorial indexes. Statistische Hefte 25, 143–158 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932397
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932397