Skip to main content
Log in

Kinetic models for growth and product formation on multiple substrates

  • Published:
Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrolyzates from lignocellulosic biomass contain a mixture of simple sugars; the predominant ones being glucose, cellobiose and xylose. The fermentation of such mixtures to ethanol or other chemicals requires an understanding of how each of these substrates is utilized.Candida lusitaniae can efficiently produce ethanol from both glucose and cellobiose and is an attractive organism for ethanol production. Experiments were performed to obtain kinetic data for ethanol production from glucose, cellobiose and xylose. Various combinations were tested in order to determine kinetic behavior with multiple carbon sources. Glucose was shown to repress the utilization of cellobiose and xylose. However, cellobiose and xylose were simultaneously utilized after glucose depletion. Maximum volumetric ethanol production rates were 0.56, 0.33, and 0.003 g/L­h from glucose, cellobiose and xylose, respectively. A kinetic model based on cAMP mediated catabolite repression was developed. This model adequately described the growth and ethanol production from a mixture of sugars in a batch culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun, Y. and J. Cheng (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review.Bioresour. Technol. 83: 1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ojumu, T. V., B. E. AttahDaniel, E. Betiku, and B. O. Solomon (2003) Auto-hydrolysis of lignocellulosics under extremely low sulphuric acid and high temperature conditions in batch reactor.Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 8: 291–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delgenes, J. P., M. C. Escare, J. M. Laplace, R. Moletta, and J. M. Navarro (1998) Biological production of industrial chemicals,i.e. xylitol and ethanol, from lignocelluloses by controlled mixed culture systems.Ind. Crops and Producis 7: 101–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, K. (2005) Comparison of fermentative capacities of lactobacilli in single and mixed culture in industrial media.Process Biochem. 40: 1559–1564.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Freer, S. N. and R. W. Detroy (1983) Characterization of cellobiose fermentations to ethanol by yeasts.Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25: 541–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spindler, D. D., C. E. Wyman, K. Grohmann, and G. P. Philippidis (1992) Evaluation of the cellobiose-fermenting yeastBrettamomyces custersii in the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose.Biotechnol. Lett. 14: 403–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakamura, Y. and T. Sawada (2003) Ethanol production from artificial domestic household waste solubilized steam explosion.Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 8: 205–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanchez, S., V. Bravo, E. Castro, A. J. Moya, and F. Camacho (1999) Comparative study of the fermentation of D-glucose/D-xylose mixtures withPachysolen tannophilus andCandida shehatae.Bioprocess Eng. 21: 525–532.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kastner, J. R., W. J. Jones, and R. S. Roberts (1999) Ethanol fermentation of mixed-sugars using a two-phase, fedbatch process: method to minimize D-glucose repression ofCandida shehatae D-xylose fermentations.J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 22: 65–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Imanaka, T. and S. Aiba (1977) A kinetic model of catabolite repression in the dual control mechanism in microorganisms.Biotechnol. Bioeng. 19: 757–764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Slaff, G. F. and A. E. Humphrey (1986) The growth ofClostridium thermohydrosulfuricum on multiple substrates.Chem. Eng. Commu. 45: 33–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nikolajsen, K., J. Nielsen, and J. Villadsen (1991) Structured modeling of a microbial system: III. Growth on mixed substrates.Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38: 24–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura, Y., T. Sawada, and E. Inoue (2001) Mathematical model for ethanol production from mixed sugars byPichia stipitis.J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76: 586–592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoon, H., G. Klinzing, and H. W. Blanch (1977) Competition for mixed substrates by microbial populations.Biotechnol. Bioeng. 19: 1193–1210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Joong Kwon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, Y.J., Engler, C.R. Kinetic models for growth and product formation on multiple substrates. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 10, 587–592 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932299

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932299

Keywords

Navigation