Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of anoxic selectors on heavy metal removal by activated sludge

  • Published:
Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this research is to compare the metal binding characteristics of an anoxic selector activated sludge system and a conventional activated sludge system. Metal biosorption by biomass harvested from experimental systems was determined by a series of batch experiments. Heavy metals studied in this research were zinc, cadmium, and nickel. The sorption isotherm showed that the selector sludge had significantly higher sorption capacity than did the control sludge. Metal biosorption behavior closely followed a Freundlich isotherm model for equilibrium concentrations. ECP contents of biomass estimated by alkali extraction technique showed that ECP levels in the selector sludge significantly higher than that in the sludge harvested from the conventional system, indicating that the higher metal sorption capacity of selector sludge may be due to the selection of the ECP-producing bacteria (i.e., Zoogloca sp.) by the selector system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jenkins, D., M. G, Richard, and G. T. Daigger (1993)Alanual on the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking and Foaming. Lewis, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cha, D. K., D. Jenkins, W. P. Lewis, and W. H. Kido (1992) Process control factors influencingnocardia popu-lations in activated sludge.Water Environ Res. 64: 37–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cha, D. K. (1990)Process Control Factors Influencing NocardiaPopulation in Activated Sludge. Ph. D. disserta-tion, University of California at Berkeley.

  4. Brown, H. G., C. P. Hensley, G. L. McKinney, and J. L. Robinson (1973) Efficiency of heavy metals removal in municipal sewage treatment plant.Environ. Lett. 5: 103–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tien C. T. and C. P. Huang (1987) Adsorption behavior of cu(ii) onto sludge particulate surfaces.J. Environ. Eng. 113: 285–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Su, M. C., D. K. Cha, and P. R. Anderson, (1995) Influence of selector technology on heavy metal removal by activated sludge: secondary effects of selector technology.Wat. Res. 29: 971–976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, M. J. and J. N. Lester (1979) Metal removal in activated sludge: the role of bacterial extracellular polymers.Wat. Res 13: 817–837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, M. J. and J. N. Lester (1982) Role of bacterial extracellular polymers in metal uptake in pure bacterial culture and activated sludge: I. Effect of metal concentration.Wat. Res. 16: 1539–1548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawson, P. S., R. M. Sterritt, and J. N. Lester (1984) Adsorption and complexation mechanisms of heavy metal uptake in activated sludge.J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 34B: 253–262.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geesey, G. G. and L. Jang (1989) Interactions between metal ions and capsular polymers pp. 325. In: T.J. Beverage and R. J. Doyle (eds.),Metal Ions and Bacteria, Wiley Interscience, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dugan, P. R. and Pickrum H. M. (1972) Removal of mineral ions from water by microbial produced polymer. pp. 1019–1038. In:Proceedings of the 27th Annual Purdue Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rudd, T., R. M. Sterritt, and J. N. Lester (1983) Stability constant and complexation capacities of complexes formed between heavy metals and extracellular polymers from activated sludge.J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 33A: 374–380.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Noberg, A. B. and H. Persson (1984) Accumulation of heavy-metal ions byZoogloea rantigera.Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26: 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman, B. A. and P. R. Dugan (1968) Concentration and accumulation of metallic ions by the bacterium.Zoogloca. Dev. Ind. Microbial. 9: 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Niekerk, A. M., D. Jenkins, and M. G. Richard (1987) The competitive growth ofZoogloea ramigera and type 021N in activated sludge and pure culture: A model for low F/M bulking.J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed. 59: 262–273.

    Google Scholar 

  16. APHA (1992)Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brown, M. J. and J. N. Lester (1980) Comparison of bacterial extracellular polymer extraction methods.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 40: 179–185.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, 19716, Newark, DE, USA

    Jay H. Niec & Daniel K. Cha

Authors
  1. Jay H. Niec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel K. Cha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel K. Cha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niec, J.H., Cha, D.K. Influence of anoxic selectors on heavy metal removal by activated sludge. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 5, 431–435 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931943

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931943

Keywords

Search

Navigation